Literature DB >> 12210383

Diagnostic accuracy of electrodiagnostic testing in the evaluation of weakness.

Rachel A Nardin1, Seward B Rutkove, Elizabeth M Raynor.   

Abstract

Electrodiagnostic testing is often used in the evaluation of patients presenting with weakness, but the diagnostic accuracy of the test in this setting is unknown. We prospectively identified 100 patients presenting to our electromyography (EMG) laboratory with the chief complaint of weakness, and compared their referring diagnosis with the electrophysiological diagnosis reached after electrodiagnostic testing. We reviewed each patient's medical record 9 months after EMG to yield a final diagnosis. Electrodiagnostic testing led to a single diagnosis in 79% of the cases; in 31%, this diagnosis was unsuspected by the referring clinician. Adequate follow-up was available for 79% of the patients. The electrodiagnostic testing resulted in a single, correct diagnosis in 73% of the patients and provided more than one possible diagnosis, one of which was correct, in an additional 18%, for an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91% in this group of patients presenting with weakness. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12210383     DOI: 10.1002/mus.10192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  11 in total

Review 1.  The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Ji Wan Park; Brant W Hager; Malcolm V Brock; Marie Diener-West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Clinical impact of magnetic resonance neurography in patients with brachial plexus neuropathies.

Authors:  Stephen Fisher; Vibhor Wadhwa; Christine Manthuruthil; Jonathan Cheng; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Association of Psychometric Indices and Normal Electrodiagnostic Studies in Referral for Suspected Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Marianna Papadopoulou; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Ioanna Chatzi; Lina Palaiodimou; Marianna Bregianni; Konstantinos Voumvourakis; Ioannis Michopoulos
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Outcomes after minimally invasive and surgical management of suprascapular nerve entrapment: A systematic review.

Authors:  Neeraj Vij; Isabella Fabian; Colby Hansen; Ahmad J Kasabali; Ivan Urits; Omar Viswanath
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-05

5.  Winged scapula caused by rhomboideus and trapezius muscles rupture associated with repetitive minor trauma: a case report.

Authors:  Sam-Gyu Lee; Jae-Hyung Kim; So-Young Lee; In-Sung Choi; Eun-Sun Moon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Requests of electrodiagnostic testing: consistency and agreement of referral diagnosis. What is changed in a primary outpatient EMG lab 16 years later?

Authors:  Mauro Mondelli; Alessandro Aretini; Giuseppe Greco
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Suprascapular neuropathy in the setting of rotator cuff tears: study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nikolaos Platon Sachinis; Achilleas Boutsiadis; Sotirios Papagiannopoulos; Konstantinos Ditsios; Anastasios Christodoulou; Pericles Papadopoulos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Suprascapular Nerve Pathology: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Lazaros Kostretzis; Ioannis Theodoroudis; Achilleas Boutsiadis; Nikolaos Papadakis; Pericles Papadopoulos
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-02-28

9.  Suprascapular nerve: is it important in cuff pathology?

Authors:  Lewis L Shi; Michael T Freehill; Paul Yannopoulos; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-11-01

10.  Axon count and sympathetic skin responses in lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Authors:  Hacer Erdem Tilki; Melek Coşkun; Neslihan Unal Akdemir; Lütfi Incesu
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.