Literature DB >> 12210169

Velocity-independent microfluidic flow cytometry.

Shulamit Eyal1, Stephen R Quake.   

Abstract

Pressure-driven flow in microfluidic channels is characterized by a distribution of velocities. This distribution makes it difficult to implement conventional flow cytometry data analysis. We have demonstrated a method to measure velocity as an independent parameter when performing microfluidic flow cytometry. This method allows velocity-independent analysis of particles such as beads or cells, and allows flow cytometry analysis of extended objects, such as long DNA molecules. It allows accurate flow cytometry in transient and nonuniform flows. This general measurement method could be used in the future to measure the velocity of particles in a variety of existing microfluidic devices without the need for changes in their design.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12210169     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(200208)23:16<2653::AID-ELPS2653>3.0.CO;2-H

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  10 in total

Review 1.  The good, the bad, and the tiny: a review of microflow cytometry.

Authors:  Daniel A Ateya; Jeffrey S Erickson; Peter B Howell; Lisa R Hilliard; Joel P Golden; Frances S Ligler
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Standing surface acoustic wave (SSAW)-based microfluidic cytometer.

Authors:  Yuchao Chen; Ahmad Ahsan Nawaz; Yanhui Zhao; Po-Hsun Huang; J Phillip McCoy; Stewart J Levine; Lin Wang; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Three-dimensional continuous particle focusing in a microfluidic channel via standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW).

Authors:  Jinjie Shi; Shahrzad Yazdi; Sz-Chin Steven Lin; Xiaoyun Ding; I-Kao Chiang; Kendra Sharp; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 4.  The intersection of flow cytometry with microfluidics and microfabrication.

Authors:  Menake E Piyasena; Steven W Graves
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  3D hydrodynamic focusing in microscale channels formed with two photoresist layers.

Authors:  Erik S Hamilton; Vahid Ganjalizadeh; Joel G Wright; William G Pitt; Holger Schmidt; Aaron R Hawkins
Journal:  Microfluid Nanofluidics       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Sub-micrometer-precision, three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamic focusing via "microfluidic drifting".

Authors:  Ahmad Ahsan Nawaz; Xiangjun Zhang; Xiaole Mao; Joseph Rufo; Sz-Chin Steven Lin; Feng Guo; Yanhui Zhao; Michael Lapsley; Peng Li; J Philip McCoy; Stewart J Levine; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Two simple and rugged designs for creating microfluidic sheath flow.

Authors:  Peter B Howell; Joel P Golden; Lisa R Hilliard; Jeffrey S Erickson; David R Mott; Frances S Ligler
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Multi-wavelength microflow cytometer using groove-generated sheath flow.

Authors:  Joel P Golden; Jason S Kim; Jeffrey S Erickson; Lisa R Hilliard; Peter B Howell; George P Anderson; Mansoor Nasir; Frances S Ligler
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  A Microfluidic Split-Flow Technology for Product Characterization in Continuous Low-Volume Nanoparticle Synthesis.

Authors:  Holger Bolze; Peer Erfle; Juliane Riewe; Heike Bunjes; Andreas Dietzel; Thomas P Burg
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Controlling Shapes in a Coaxial Flow Focusing Microfluidic Device: Experiments and Theory.

Authors:  Romen Rodriguez-Trujillo; Yu-Han Kim-Im; Aurora Hernandez-Machado
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.891

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.