BACKGROUND: Because most low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) regress spontaneously, the appropriate follow-up of women with a cytologic diagnosis of LSIL has engendered discussion. This retrospective study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of limiting colposcopy to women with cytologic interpretations of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in a high-risk population. METHODS: The pathology computer files (including files from January to December 1997) of The University Hospital, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, revealed 197 women whose histologic samples were coded as severe dysplasia. Of these, 138 had a cervical smear interpreted in our laboratory before the colposcopic visit. On review, the tissue samples of 119 women met consensus criteria for severe dysplasia. RESULTS: Original cytologic diagnoses for 119 cytologic smears included 80 (62.7%) that were interpreted as HSIL. After retrospective review, 28 cases with LSIL or less were reclassified as HSIL and were considered to be discrepant for the purpose of this study. Major confounding factors in the original categorization include lack of consistency among the pathologists for the interpretation of metaplastic patterns and specimen adequacy, particularly air-drying artifact. Eleven cases (10.2%) did not have cells identifiable as HSIL because of sampling error and/or severe air-drying artifact. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a substantial number of histologically verified cases of severe dysplasia can have a smear interpretation of LSIL or less. The factors that hampered recognition of the true severity of the lesion in this series were identified and tabulated. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Because most low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) regress spontaneously, the appropriate follow-up of women with a cytologic diagnosis of LSIL has engendered discussion. This retrospective study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of limiting colposcopy to women with cytologic interpretations of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in a high-risk population. METHODS: The pathology computer files (including files from January to December 1997) of The University Hospital, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, revealed 197 women whose histologic samples were coded as severe dysplasia. Of these, 138 had a cervical smear interpreted in our laboratory before the colposcopic visit. On review, the tissue samples of 119 women met consensus criteria for severe dysplasia. RESULTS: Original cytologic diagnoses for 119 cytologic smears included 80 (62.7%) that were interpreted as HSIL. After retrospective review, 28 cases with LSIL or less were reclassified as HSIL and were considered to be discrepant for the purpose of this study. Major confounding factors in the original categorization include lack of consistency among the pathologists for the interpretation of metaplastic patterns and specimen adequacy, particularly air-drying artifact. Eleven cases (10.2%) did not have cells identifiable as HSIL because of sampling error and/or severe air-drying artifact. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a substantial number of histologically verified cases of severe dysplasia can have a smear interpretation of LSIL or less. The factors that hampered recognition of the true severity of the lesion in this series were identified and tabulated. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.