OBJECTIVE: To compare two single-dilator percutaneous tracheostomy techniques, Ciaglia Blue Rhino and the new PercuTwist technique. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, observational clinical trial in patients undergoing elective percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care units of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy consecutive, adult patients undergoing either Blue Rhino ( n=35) or PercuTwist tracheostomy ( n=35). INTERVENTIONS: Performance of percutaneous tracheostomy with a novel screwlike dilating device (PercuTwist) or conically shaped, flexible rubber dilator (Blue Rhino). RESULTS: Stoma dilation was successful with the respective device in all patients. While subsequent tracheostomy cannula insertion was uneventful in all but one patients undergoing the Blue Rhino technique, it was difficult or even impossible in eight patients who underwent PercuTwist tracheostomy. Regarding serious and intermediate procedural-related complications, two cases of posterior tracheal wall injury occurred with the PercuTwist technique. No serious or intermediate complications were noted during Blue Rhino tracheostomy. There was no statistical significance between the two techniques in terms of minor and overall complications. CONCLUSIONS: So far the new PercuTwist technique represents an alternative to the established Blue Rhino technique. Nonetheless, the two cases of posterior tracheal wall injury should not be underestimated, on the one hand, but, on the other, may be attributed to a learning curve with a new technique. The new PercuTwist technique should be performed by various teams and in a considerably larger numbers of patients before an ultimate rating can be made.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare two single-dilator percutaneous tracheostomy techniques, Ciaglia Blue Rhino and the new PercuTwist technique. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, observational clinical trial in patients undergoing elective percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care units of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy consecutive, adult patients undergoing either Blue Rhino ( n=35) or PercuTwist tracheostomy ( n=35). INTERVENTIONS: Performance of percutaneous tracheostomy with a novel screwlike dilating device (PercuTwist) or conically shaped, flexible rubber dilator (Blue Rhino). RESULTS:Stoma dilation was successful with the respective device in all patients. While subsequent tracheostomy cannula insertion was uneventful in all but one patients undergoing the Blue Rhino technique, it was difficult or even impossible in eight patients who underwent PercuTwist tracheostomy. Regarding serious and intermediate procedural-related complications, two cases of posterior tracheal wall injury occurred with the PercuTwist technique. No serious or intermediate complications were noted during Blue Rhino tracheostomy. There was no statistical significance between the two techniques in terms of minor and overall complications. CONCLUSIONS: So far the new PercuTwist technique represents an alternative to the established Blue Rhino technique. Nonetheless, the two cases of posterior tracheal wall injury should not be underestimated, on the one hand, but, on the other, may be attributed to a learning curve with a new technique. The new PercuTwist technique should be performed by various teams and in a considerably larger numbers of patients before an ultimate rating can be made.
Authors: Carlos M Romero; Rodrigo Cornejo; Eduardo Tobar; Ricardo Gálvez; Cecilia Luengo; Nivia Estuardo; Rodolfo Neira; José Luis Navarro; Osvaldo Abarca; Mauricio Ruiz; María Angélica Berasaín; Wilson Neira; Daniel Arellano; Osvaldo Llanos Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2015 Apr-Jun