Literature DB >> 12208405

Comparison of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with unstable angina pectoris/non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction having subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention.

Keith A A Fox1, Elliott M Antman, Marc Cohen, Frederique Bigonzi.   

Abstract

Patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) may undergo invasive revascularization procedures shortly after admission to hospital or after a brief period of stabilization. In the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B trial and Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) trial 1,326 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 924 patients underwent PCI during the initial hospitalization period, and of these, 445 patients did so while receiving treatment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or the low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin. This analysis compared efficacy and clinical events in the enoxaparin and UFH groups in patients who: (1) underwent PCI while on treatment versus those who did not, and (2) underwent PCI in hospital. We also compared those who did not undergo PCI. Treatment with enoxaparin (1 mg/kg given as twice daily subcutaneous injections) was beneficial and well tolerated in patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation MI who underwent PCI. Compared with UFH, enoxaparin significantly reduced the likelihood of clinical events (death and nonfatal MI after PCI) in patients who underwent PCI after 1 year (p = 0.003 for in-hospital PCI; p = 0.005 for on-treatment PCI), with a trend toward a reduced event rate at 43 days. In addition, patients treated with enoxaparin who did not undergo PCI also showed a reduction in the risk of death, nonfatal MI, and urgent revascularization when compared with those treated with UFH (significant at 43 days, with a trend persisting at 1 year). Study limitations were that PCI was nonrandomized, the analysis was post hoc, and the sample size was relatively small. Nevertheless, in the absence of large clinical trials, this study suggests that treatment with enoxaparin was well tolerated, and exhibited a similar risk of major hemorrhage to UFH in patients who underwent PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12208405     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02517-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  Which antithrombin for whom? Identifying the patient population that benefits most from novel antithrombin agents.

Authors:  David A Burke; Haider J Warraich; Duane S Pinto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  The use of a HEMOCHRON JR. HEMONOX point of care test in monitoring the anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin during interventional coronary procedures.

Authors:  Soumaya El Rouby; Marc Cohen; Andrea Gonzales; Debra Hoppensteadt; Ted Lee; Marcia L Zucker; Khaula Khalid; Frank M Laduca; Jawed Fareed
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Antithrombotic therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Serdar Farhan; Thomas Höchtl; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Johann Wojta; Kurt Huber
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-01

4.  Degree of anticoagulation after one subcutaneous and one subsequent intravenous booster dose of enoxaparin: implications for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Glenn N Levine; Tracy Ferrando
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Distinct yet complementary mechanisms of heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors on platelet activation and aggregation: implications for restenosis during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  J R S Day; I S Malik; A Weerasinghe; M Poullis; I Nadra; D O Haskard; K M Taylor; R C Landis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Is the use of unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndrome outmoded?

Authors:  Elaine Chiquette; Robert Chilton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  Comparison of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pengcheng He; Yuanhui Liu; Xuebiao Wei; Lei Jiang; Wei Guo; Zhiqiang Guo; Chunying Lin; Ning Tan; Jiyan Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Effect of subcutaneous Enoxaparin injection duration on bruising size in acute coronary syndrome patients.

Authors:  Khadije Dehghani; Zahra Najari; Hamideh Dehghani
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.