Literature DB >> 12208402

Randomized comparison of success and adverse event rates and cost effectiveness of one long versus two short stents for treatment of long coronary narrowings.

Rainer Hoffmann1, Gunhild Herrmann, Sigmund Silber, Peter Braun, Gerald S Werner, Benno Hennen, Hans Rupprecht, J vom Dahl, Peter Hanrath.   

Abstract

Long stents of high flexibility and low profile have become widely available. Treatment of long coronary lesions by 1 long stent may require less interventional efforts and reduce the rate of restenosis due to a lack of overlapping stent segments. This study sought to evaluate the use of 1 long stent compared with 2 short stents for treatment of long coronary lesions. One-hundred twenty-four patients with a coronary lesion 20 to 40 mm in length, in a vessel 2.5 to 4.0 mm in diameter, were randomly assigned to treatment with 1 long stent (GFX II stents or S670 of 24, 30, or 40 mm lengths; n = 62) or 2 stents (GFX II or S670 stents, n = 62) of equal length. Procedural success, interventional costs, as well as long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes were evaluated. Lesion characteristics were similar for the 2 treatment groups. Stent placement was possible as assigned by randomization in 61 of 62 cases (98%) in the 1-long-stent group and 100% of cases in the 2-short-stents group. There was crossover to successful short-stent placement in 1 case. The in-hospital success rate was 97% for the 1-long-stent group and 98% for the 2-short-stents group. Acute angiographic results were similar for both groups after intervention. The angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months was 38.5% in the 1-long-stent group and 37.5% in the 2-short-stents group (p = 0.919). Intervention time was less, and the need for a contrast agent had a tendency to be lower in the long-stent group. Procedural costs were significantly less in the long-stent group. In conclusion, 1 long stent can be used with identical procedural success and adverse event rates as 2 short stents in long, atherosclerotic coronary lesions. The restenosis rate is not reduced by the use of 1 long stent compared with 2 stents. However, long stent placement is highly cost effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12208402     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02514-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Successful Treatment of Symptomatic Intracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis Using a 24-mm Long Bare Metal Coronary Stent.

Authors:  Azeem A Rehman; Ryan C Turner; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; SoHyun Boo
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Outcomes of stenting with overlapping drug-eluting stents versus overlapping drug-eluting and bare-metal stents for the treatment of diffuse coronary lesions.

Authors:  S E Kassaian; M Salarifar; M Raissi Dehkordi; M Alidoosti; E Nematipour; H R Poorhosseini; A M Hajizeinali; D Kazemisaleh; A Sharafi; M Mahmoodian; N Paydari; A V Farahani
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.167

3.  Safety and efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting bioabsorbable Polymer-Coated stent in patients with long coronary lesions: The EVOLVE 48 study.

Authors:  Dimitrios Karmpaliotis; Robert Stoler; Simon Walsh; Seif El-Jack; Srinivasa Potluri; Jeffrey Moses; Keith Oldroyd; Adrian Banning; Mark Webster; Azfar Zaman; Willis Wu; Mudassar Ahmed; Paul Underwood; Dominic Allocco
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.585

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.