Literature DB >> 1220835

Acceptability of the cytopipette in screening for cervical cancer.

J Carruthers, J M Wilson, J Chamberlain, O A Husain, D G Patey, N D Richards, A Pennicott, P Rogers, R Catling, T W Meade, J Saunders, P J McEwan.   

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial was carried out in which the acceptability of screening for cervical carcinoma in situ by a postal 'do-it-yourself' method--the cytopipette--was compared with that of an invitation to attend a clinic or see a general practitioner for the conventional cervical scrape examination. In parallel with this, a sociological study of women who had been invited by both methods was undertaken in which information was obtained from responders and non-responders on attitudes to health care. The results show that, while the pipette was used by a greater proportion of women overall than the scrape examination, its acceptance by women most at risk of the disease is still not high. It is concluded that, taking into account the relative merits of the two methods as screening tests, as well as their acceptability and cost, the postal pipette may be useful in some circumstances, such as areas where clinical resources are limited, and as a second approach to women who have not taken up the offer of a scrape examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1220835      PMCID: PMC478921          DOI: 10.1136/jech.29.4.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med        ISSN: 0007-1242


  19 in total

1.  Detection of preinvasive cancer by the irrigation smear technic.

Authors:  H J DAVIS; L KURZ
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1962-08

2.  Cervical cytology consent rate.

Authors:  J Saunders; A H Snaith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1969-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Trends in mortality from cancer of the uterus in Canada and in England and Wales.

Authors:  L J Kinlen; R Doll
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1973-08

4.  Response to a program of screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  S M Naguib; P B Geiser; G W Comstock
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  The irrigation smear. A comparative trial of vaginal irrigation pipette and spatula smears in the detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  O A Husain
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1970-01-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  A critical evaluation of the vaginal irrigation kit as a screening method for the detection of cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  W A Anderson; S A Gunn
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1966 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.319

7.  Vaginal irrigation-pipette smear.

Authors:  A F Anderson; F R Clark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1966-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Evaluation of the vaginal irrigation smear technique.

Authors:  L A Carrow; R R Hilker; R H Elesh; P R Eggum
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1967-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Detection of cervical cancer by irrigation smear and cervical scraping.

Authors:  J M Muskett; A K Carter; O G Dodge
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1966-08-06

10.  Cancer of the uterine cervix in Aberdeenshire. Aetiological aspects.

Authors:  J Aitken-Swan; D Baird
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Screening for presymptomatic disease.

Authors:  F V Flynn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.