Literature DB >> 12207991

Mechanisms underlying perseveration in aphasia: evidence from a single case study.

Stephen J Gotts1, Antonio Incisa della Rocchetta, Lisa Cipolotti.   

Abstract

Aphasic individuals often inappropriately and unintentionally repeat recent responses, errors termed recurrent perseverations. In a series of picture naming experiments, we investigated the impact of manipulating stimulus factors on the number of perseverations produced by an aphasic patient (E.B.) with markedly impaired naming skills. E.B. produced significantly more perseverations to pictures with low frequency names and following stimulus repetition. In contrast, semantic relatedness and presentation rate failed to influence perseveration. Our results are considered in the context of theories that relate recurrent perseverations to intact priming mechanisms [Brain 121 (1998) 1641; Aphasiology 12 (1998) 319; J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 19 (1993) 243]. We conclude that these theories can correctly predict some but not all aspects of E.B.'s perseverations. In particular, they failed to predict that: (1) perseverations often appeared to reflect the earlier sequential proximity of stimuli and responses; and (2) perseverations became less likely as more experimental trials intervened, a trend that did not interact with presentation rate. We review evidence relating recurrent perseverations to neuromodulatory deficits and we conclude that a theory of the functional role of neuromodulation in the cerebral cortex proposed by Hasselmo [Neural Netw. 7 (1994) 13] is capable of accounting for all aspects of E.B.'s perseverative behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12207991     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00067-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  11 in total

1.  Underlying cause(s) of letter perseveration errors.

Authors:  Simon Fischer-Baum; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Manipulability and object recognition: is manipulability a semantic feature?

Authors:  Fabio Campanella; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Object identification leads to a conceptual broadening of object representations in lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Stephen J Gotts; Shawn C Milleville; Alex Martin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Incremental learning of perceptual and conceptual representations and the puzzle of neural repetition suppression.

Authors:  Stephen J Gotts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

5.  Remembering 'zeal' but not 'thing': reverse frequency effects as a consequence of deregulated semantic processing.

Authors:  Paul Hoffman; Elizabeth Jefferies; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Psycholinguistics of Aphasia Pharmacotherapy: Asking the Right Questions.

Authors:  Dalia Cahana-Amitay; Martin L Albert; Abigail Oveis
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 7.  Neuroscience insights improve neurorehabilitation of poststroke aphasia.

Authors:  Marcelo L Berthier; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Semantic access dysphasia resulting from left temporal lobe tumours.

Authors:  Fabio Campanella; Massimo Mondani; Miran Skrap; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Temporal characteristics of semantic perseverations induced by blocked-cyclic picture naming.

Authors:  Esther Y Hsiao; Myrna F Schwartz; Tatiana T Schnur; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 10.  Drug therapy of post-stroke aphasia: a review of current evidence.

Authors:  Marcelo L Berthier; Friedemann Pulvermüller; Guadalupe Dávila; Natalia García Casares; Antonio Gutiérrez
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.