Literature DB >> 12207989

Hemispheric lateralization of the processing of consonant-vowel syllables (formant transitions): effects of stimulus characteristics and attentional demands on evoked magnetic fields.

Ingo Hertrich1, Klaus Mathiak, Werner Lutzenberger, Hermann Ackermann.   

Abstract

It is still unsettled in how far temporal resolution of dynamic acoustic events (formant transitions) or phonetic/linguistic processes contribute to predominant left-hemisphere encoding of consonant-vowel syllables. To further elucidate the underlying mechanisms, evoked magnetic fields in response to consonant-vowel events (synthetic versus spoken) were recorded (oddball design: standards=binaural/ba/, deviants=dichotic/ba/-/da/; 20 right-handed subjects) under different attentional conditions (visual distraction versus stimulus identification). Spoken events yielded a left-lateralized peak phase of the mismatch field (MMF; 150-200ms post-stimulus onset) in response to right-ear deviants during distraction. By contrast, pre-attentive processing of synthetic items gave rise to a left-enhanced MMF onset (100ms), but failed to elicit later lateralization effects. In case of directed attention, synthetic deviants elicited a left-pronounced MMF peak resembling the pre-attentive response to natural syllables. These interactions of MMF asymmetry with signal structure and attentional load indicate two distinct successive left-lateralization effects: signal-related operations and representation of 'phonetic traces'. Furthermore, a right-lateralized early MMF component (100ms) emerged in response to natural syllables during pre-attentive processing and to synthetic stimuli in case of directed attention. Conceivably, these effects indicate right hemisphere operations prior to phonetic evaluation such as periodicity representation. Two distinct time windows showed correlations between dichotic listening performance and ear effects on magnetic responses reflecting early gain factors (ca. 75ms post-stimulus onset) and binaural fusion strategies (ca. 200ms), respectively. Finally, gender interacted with MMF lateralization, indicating different processing strategies in case of artificial speech signals.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12207989     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00063-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  4 in total

1.  Linear coding of voice onset time.

Authors:  Richard E Frye; Janet McGraw Fisher; Alexis Coty; Melissa Zarella; Jacqueline Liederman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Mood modulates auditory laterality of hemodynamic mismatch responses during dichotic listening.

Authors:  Lisa Schock; Miriam Dyck; Liliana R Demenescu; J Christopher Edgar; Ingo Hertrich; Walter Sturm; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Does valence in the visual domain influence the spatial attention after auditory deviants? Exploratory data.

Authors:  Lisa Schock; Saurabh Bhavsar; Liliana R Demenescu; Walter Sturm; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Dichotic listening test (directed attention mode) in children with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Isabel Cristina Cavalcanti Lemos; Camila Zotelli Monteiro; Renata Arruda Camargo; Ariane Cristina Sampaio Rissato; Mariza Ribeiro Feniman
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.