Literature DB >> 12207753

Discrepancies between patients and professionals in the assessment of patient needs: a quantitative study of Norwegian mental health care.

Thomas Hansen1, Trond Hatling, Eli Lidal, Torleif Ruud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sensitivity to and respect for the user perspective are important facets of user-centred services and empowerment in contemporary mental health care. Little is known about the extent to which new policies influence mental health work in practice. AIMS: To investigate discrepancy between patients and professionals in the assessment of patient needs. Analyses could indicate emphasis on user orientation in Norwegian mental health care.
METHODS: Patients and their respective health professionals (n = 1080) completed separate questionnaires regarding patient characteristics and needs. Identifiers were removed from the data locally and then entered into a national database. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis were used to explore mean levels of discrepancy and predictors of discrepancy.
RESULTS: Mean discrepancy was low, as, on average, 30 of the listed 40 needs were considered absent by both the patients and their respective professional. However, the parties showed distinct disagreement as to the amount and type of needs that were present. Specifically, professionals identified more needs than patients (9.3 vs. 4.3, respectively) and this difference was characterized by a strong professional emphasis on needs regarding professional monitoring and follow-up. Results showed that symptoms of severe cognitive disability were over-represented in the group of patients with the highest level of discrepancy, however, the majority of high-discrepancy patients were not severely disabled on cognitive functions. A multiple regression analysis revealed 10 predictors of high discrepancy. DISCUSSION: A low professional emphasis on user-orientation may be indicated in some cases. Results are discussed with relation to the tension between autonomy and beneficence. Suggestions for practice and further research conclude the paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12207753     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02324.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  3 in total

1.  Inpatients' and providers' experiences with user involvement in inpatient care.

Authors:  Marianne Storm; Larry Davidson
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2010-06

2.  Care Dependency of Hospitalized Stroke Patients Based on Family Caregivers' and Nurses' Assessments: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Nursiswati Nursiswati; Ruud J G Halfens; Christa Lohrmann
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  Spatial barriers as moral failings: What rural distance can teach us about women's health and medical mistrust author names and affiliations.

Authors:  Michele Statz; Kaylie Evers
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.931

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.