Literature DB >> 12206949

Loading response following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during the parallel squat exercise.

Jennifer A Neitzel1, Thomas W Kernozek, George J Davies.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if individuals 1.5-15 months post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction demonstrated an equal loading response on their involved and uninvolved lower extremity during a parallel squat exercise versus a control group.
DESIGN: Four-group repeated measures design with one between-subject factor (time post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction) and two within-subject factors (knee angle and added weight).
BACKGROUND: It has been a clinical observation that post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, individuals do not place equal amounts of weight upon each lower extremity during double-leg exercises.
METHODS: Twenty-four subjects were in each of the experimental groups, 1.5-4 months, 6-7 months, and 12-15 months post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, while 24 subjects without history of lower extremity pathology/injury served as the control group. Pedar in-shoe sensors were placed inside the subjects' shoes to record loading response patterns during the exercises. All performed 3 sets of 9 randomized squats to each of the three knee flexion angles (30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees ) with the three different weights (20.45 kg bar only, 35%, and 50% body mass) using a Smith squat rack. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA (P < 0.050) was used to compare the differences between groups in loading response statically between the uninvolved and involved lower extremity for each of the different weights at each knee flexion angle during the squat exercise.
RESULTS: The three-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed that there was a significant group effect (P < 0.001). Thus, the amount of time post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction affected the difference in the subjects' loading response for the uninvolved and involved lower extremities. There was also a three-way interaction, indicating that the difference in loading response was dependent on the group, amount of knee flexion, and amount of added weight (P = 0.010).
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that subjects significantly load their uninvolved lower extremity until 12-15 months post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. RELEVANCE: Based on the results of this study, caution may be warranted when adding resistance during the parallel squat for an individual's first year post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, particularly with less knee flexion to avoid compensation and injury. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12206949     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00063-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  17 in total

1.  Recent advances following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: rehabilitation perspectives : Critical reviews in rehabilitation medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Manske; Daniel Prohaska; Brennen Lucas
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-03

2.  Static and dynamic postural control in competitive athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controls.

Authors:  Farshid Mohammadi; Mahyar Salavati; Behnam Akhbari; Masood Mazaheri; Mojdeh Khorrami; Hossein Negahban
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Measurement and evaluation of dynamic joint stability of the knee and ankle after injury.

Authors:  Erik A Wikstrom; Mark D Tillman; Terese L Chmielewski; Paul A Borsa
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Utilization of modified NFL combine testing to identify functional deficits in athletes following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Laura C Schmitt; Jensen L Brent; Kevin R Ford; Kim D Barber Foss; Bradley J Scherer; Robert S Heidt; Jon G Divine; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of combined complex ligament injuries.

Authors:  Richard L Romeyn; Jason Jennings; George J Davies
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-11

6.  Postactivation potentiation: an introduction.

Authors:  Daniel Lorenz
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09

7.  The impact of quadriceps femoris strength asymmetry on functional performance at return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Laura C Schmitt; Mark V Paterno; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  A TEN TASK-BASED PROGRESSION IN REHABILITATION AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION: FROM POST-SURGERY TO RETURN TO PLAY - A CLINICAL COMMENTARY.

Authors:  Matthew Buckthorpe; Antonio Tamisari; Francesco Della Villa
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-08

9.  Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno; Mitchell J Rauh; Laura C Schmitt; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.638

10.  Symmetry of squatting and the effect of fatigue following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Darren C Austin; Julian A Feller; Ross A Clark; Jodie A McClelland
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.