Literature DB >> 12205262

Does parenchymal brain injury affect biobehavioral pain responses in very low birth weight infants at 32 weeks' postconceptional age?

Tim F Oberlander1, Ruth E Grunau, Colleen Fitzgerald, Michael F Whitfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Children with neurologic impairments have shown diminished pain response compared with control subjects; however, it remains unclear what mechanisms underlie this response or when it develops. If this were also true with premature infants who undergo neonatal intensive care, then infants with parenchymal brain injury (PBI) would be at increased risk of underrecognition and undertreatment of procedural pain. The purpose of this study was to determine whether infants with PBI display altered responses to acute procedural pain at 32 weeks' postconceptional age (PCA), compared with control subjects.
METHODS: We compared responses to blood collection by heel lance at 32 weeks' PCA in 12 very low birth weight infants (mean [range] birth weight: 876 g [630-1240 g]; gestational age: 26.3 weeks (24-28 weeks) who had sustained PBI in the neonatal period, with 12 control subjects matched for gestational age at birth and gender (838 g [625-990 g]; 26.3 weeks [24-28 weeks[) who had normal neonatal brain imaging. PBI was defined as cerebral parenchymal infarction (grade 4 intraventricular hemorrhage) or cystic periventricular leukomalacia on serial cranial ultrasound scans conducted in the neonatal period. Biobehavioral responses to pain were measured using facial activity (Neonatal Facial Coding System) and measures of heart rate (HR) variability (low-frequency [LF] power [0.04-0.15], high-frequency [HF] power [0.15-0.8 Hz], and LF/HF ratio) as a measure of cardiac autonomic modulation. Neurodevelopmental follow-up was undertaken at 18 months.
RESULTS: The infants with PBI had significantly higher illness severity scores at day 1 compared with day 3 (Score of Neonatal Acute Physiology II: 32.1 vs 19.8) but similar previous pain experiences (109 vs 115) and total morphine exposure (0.29 vs 0.30 mg/kg). Both groups of children mounted similar responses to heel lance at 32 weeks' PCA with no difference in facial response or HR variability. Mean HR and facial action scores increased from baseline to the lance, whereas LF, HF, and the LF/HF ratio decreased significantly. No group differences were found. The only statistically significant difference between groups was that infants with PBI had more tongue protrusion at lance. Neurodevelopmental follow-up showed 8 of 11 toddlers with PBI had cerebral palsy compared with 0% of control toddlers. Psychomotor Developmental Index score on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II was significantly lower in the PBI group. Five of 11 toddlers with PBI had Mental Developmental Index score <2 standard deviations below mean compared with 0% of the control toddlers.
CONCLUSION: Contrary to expectations, we did not find any evidence of an altered pain response pattern in infants with proven brain injury in the neonatal period. Although most infants with PBI developed cerebral palsy, these findings suggest that cerebral injury predominantly to the central white matter leaves brainstem responses intact in the neonatal period. Furthermore, it seems that the injured brain of the preterm infant has not yet expressed the identifiable differences in pain display and the functional impairment observed at later ages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12205262     DOI: 10.1542/peds.110.3.570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  12 in total

Review 1.  Sugaring the pill: ethics and uncertainties in the use of sucrose for newborn infants.

Authors:  Dominic J C Wilkinson; Julian Savulescu; Rebeccah Slater
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-07-01

2.  Kangaroo Care modifies preterm infant heart rate variability in response to heel stick pain: pilot study.

Authors:  Xiaomei Cong; Susan M Ludington-Hoe; Gail McCain; Pingfu Fu
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Is it painful or not? Discriminant validity of the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain (BIIP) scale.

Authors:  Liisa Holsti; Ruth E Grunau; Tim F Oberlander; Horacio Osiovich
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Cortical pain responses in human infants.

Authors:  Rebeccah Slater; Anne Cantarella; Shiromi Gallella; Alan Worley; Stewart Boyd; Judith Meek; Maria Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Can healthy fetuses show facial expressions of "pain" or "distress"?

Authors:  Nadja Reissland; Brian Francis; James Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebeccah Slater; Laura Cornelissen; Lorenzo Fabrizi; Debbie Patten; Jan Yoxen; Alan Worley; Stewart Boyd; Judith Meek; Maria Fitzgerald
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Initial validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain (BIIP).

Authors:  Liisa Holsti; Ruth E Grunau
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 8.  Evidences of emerging pain consciousness during prenatal development: a narrative review.

Authors:  Raffaele Falsaperla; Ausilia Desiree Collotta; Michela Spatuzza; Maria Familiari; Giovanna Vitaliti; Martino Ruggieri
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.830

9.  Identification of pain indicators for infants at risk for neurological impairment: a Delphi consensus study.

Authors:  Bonnie Stevens; Patrick McGrath; Janet Yamada; Sharyn Gibbins; Joseph Beyene; Lynn Breau; Carol Camfield; Allen Finley; Linda Franck; Alexandra Howlett; Celeste Johnston; Patricia McKeever; Karel O'Brien; Arne Ohlsson
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  fMRI reveals neural activity overlap between adult and infant pain.

Authors:  Sezgi Goksan; Caroline Hartley; Faith Emery; Naomi Cockrill; Ravi Poorun; Fiona Moultrie; Richard Rogers; Jon Campbell; Michael Sanders; Eleri Adams; Stuart Clare; Mark Jenkinson; Irene Tracey; Rebeccah Slater
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.