Literature DB >> 12204986

Measuring plasma paracetamol concentrations in all patients with drug overdoses; development of a clinical decision rule and clinicians willingness to use it.

K Hartington1, J Hartley, M Clancy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study proposed a clinical decision rule: In patients who have taken a deliberate overdose, but deny taking paracetamol or paracetamol containing compounds, who have a GCS of 15, understand English well, and have not taken excessive alcohol, there is no need to take blood for paracetamol estimation.
METHODS: 307 consecutive emergency department patients were followed up, and the history of their overdose was correlated to blood paracetamol concentrations. In addition, clinicians were asked what level of confidence they required from such a clinical decision rule before they would use it.
RESULTS: 152 admitted paracetamol and 155 denied it. Of the 155 that denied it, 13 had concentrations detected in the blood, but needed no treatment with antidote. Eighty three per cent of clinicians require a false negative rate of less than 1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Using this decision rule, only 46 of 307 patients would not have required paracetamol concentrations to be measured. To show a negative rate of less than 1% a sample size of 20,000 patients would be needed. BOTTOM LINE: All patients who allege taking an overdose need paracetamol concentrations checking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12204986      PMCID: PMC1725951          DOI: 10.1136/emj.19.5.408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

1.  Measuring plasma paracetamol concentrations in all patients with drug overdose or altered consciousness: does it change outcome?

Authors:  P I Dargan; S Ladhani; A L Jones
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Severe epinephrine-propranolol interaction.

Authors:  W Gandy
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  The clinical value of screening for paracetamol in patients with acute poisoning.

Authors:  T Y Chan; A Y Chan; C S Ho; J A Critchley
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Acetaminophen and salicylate serum levels in patients with suicidal ingestion or altered mental status.

Authors:  K A Sporer; H Khayam-Bashi
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Trends in deliberate self poisoning and self injury in Oxford, 1976-90.

Authors:  K Hawton; J Fagg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-30

6.  Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning. No need to change current guidelines to accident departments.

Authors:  P Routledge; J A Vale; D N Bateman; G D Johnston; A Jones; A Judd; S Thomas; G Volans; L F Prescott; A Proudfoot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-12-12

7.  Intravenous N-acetylcystine: the treatment of choice for paracetamol poisoning.

Authors:  L F Prescott; R N Illingworth; J A Critchley; M J Stewart; R D Adam; A T Proudfoot
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-11-03
  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Acute poisoning: understanding 90% of cases in a nutshell.

Authors:  S L Greene; P I Dargan; A L Jones
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  A novel approach for estimating ingested dose associated with paracetamol overdose.

Authors:  Todd J Zurlinden; Kennon Heard; Brad Reisfeld
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  A quick inexpensive laboratory method in acute paracetamol poisoning could improve risk assessment, management and resource utilization.

Authors:  S M D K Ganga Senarathna; Shalini S Ranganathan; Nick Buckley; S S S B D Preethi Soysa; B M Rohini Fernandopulle
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.200

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.