PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arterial spin labeling to perfusion deficits in the lung. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A rabbit model of pulmonary embolism was imaged with both flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery with an extra radiofrequency pulse (FAIRER) arterial spin labeling and Gd-DOTA enhanced MRI. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was measured in the area of the perfusion deficit and the normal lung for both techniques. RESULTS: The defect was readily visible in all images. The normal lung had an average of 3.8 +/- 1.2 times the SNR of the unperfused lung with the arterial spin labeling technique, and approximately 13.7 +/- 3.3 times the SNR with the contrast-enhanced technique. CONCLUSION: Gd-DOTA enhanced MRI provides higher SNR in pulmonary perfusion imaging; however, arterial spin labeling is also adequate and may be used when repeated studies are indicated. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arterial spin labeling to perfusion deficits in the lung. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A rabbit model of pulmonary embolism was imaged with both flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery with an extra radiofrequency pulse (FAIRER) arterial spin labeling and Gd-DOTA enhanced MRI. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was measured in the area of the perfusion deficit and the normal lung for both techniques. RESULTS: The defect was readily visible in all images. The normal lung had an average of 3.8 +/- 1.2 times the SNR of the unperfused lung with the arterial spin labeling technique, and approximately 13.7 +/- 3.3 times the SNR with the contrast-enhanced technique. CONCLUSION:Gd-DOTA enhanced MRI provides higher SNR in pulmonary perfusion imaging; however, arterial spin labeling is also adequate and may be used when repeated studies are indicated. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Nasreddin D Abolmaali; Jan Schmitt; Sabine Krauss; Frank Bretz; Michael Deimling; Volkmar Jacobi; Thomas J Vogl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-02-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nanae Tsuchiya; Edwin Jr van Beek; Yoshiharu Ohno; Hiroto Hatabu; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Andrew Swift; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Jürgen Biederer; James Wild; Mark O Wielpütz; Mark L Schiebler Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2018-06-28
Authors: Shella D Keilholz; Ugur Bozlar; Naomi Fujiwara; Jaime F Mata; Stuart S Berr; Claire Corot; Klaus D Hagspiel Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 3.500