Literature DB >> 12203407

Mammalian cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity analysis of drinking water disinfection by-products.

Michael J Plewa1, Yahya Kargalioglu, Danielle Vankerk, Roger A Minear, Elizabeth D Wagner.   

Abstract

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assays were used to analyze drinking water disinfection by-products (DBPs) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) AS52 cells. The DBPs were chosen because they are common in drinking water, resulting from conventional disinfection using chlorination and chloramination. Data were also available to compare these results with cytotoxicity and mutagenicity studies in Salmonella typhimurium. The rank order in decreasing chronic cytotoxicity measured in a microplate-based assay was bromoacetic acid (BA) >> 3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2[5H]-furanone (MX) > dibromoacetic acid (DBA) > chloroacetic acid (CA) > KBrO(3) > tribromoacetic acid (TBA) > EMS (ethylmethanesulfonate, positive control) > dichloroacetic acid (DCA) > trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The induction of DNA strand breaks by these agents was measured by alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE, comet assay) and the rank order in decreasing genotoxicity was BA >> MX > CA > DBA > TBA > EMS > KBrO(3), while DCA and TCA were refractory. BA was more cytotoxic (31x) and genotoxic (14x) than MX in CHO cells. BA was over 400x more genotoxic than potassium bromate. The brominated haloacetic acids (HAAs) were more cytotoxic and genotoxic than their chlorinated analogs. The HAAs expressed a statistically significant inverse relationship in CHO cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity as a function of increased numbers of halogen atoms per molecule. A quantitative comparison was conducted with results from a previous study with cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in S. typhimurium. There was no correlation between chronic CHO cell and bacterial cell cytotoxicity. DBP-induced CHO cell cytotoxicity was not related to mutagenic potency in S. typhimurium. Cytotoxicity in CHO cells was statistically significant and highly correlated to CHO cell genotoxicity. Finally, we determined that the DBP genotoxic potency in CHO cells and the mutagenic potency in S. typhimurium were not related. This suggests that toxicity data in S. typhimurium did not quantitatively predict the toxic effects of DBPs in mammalian cell systems. The microplate CHO cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assays were well suited for the analysis of DBPs, especially when the quantity of test material is limited. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12203407     DOI: 10.1002/em.10092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  22 in total

1.  Subacute toxicity assessment of water disinfection byproducts on zebrafish.

Authors:  Gergely Rácz; Zsolt Csenki; Róbert Kovács; Arpád Hegyi; Ferenc Baska; László Sujbert; Ivett Zsákovics; Renáta Kis; Ryan Gustafson; Béla Urbányi; Béla Szende
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Identification of Novel Surfactant-Derived Sulfur-Containing Disinfection Byproducts from Gas Extraction Wastewater.

Authors:  Hannah K Liberatore; Danielle C Westerman; Joshua M Allen; Michael J Plewa; Elizabeth D Wagner; Amy M McKenna; Chad R Weisbrod; James P McCord; Richard J Liberatore; David B Burnett; Leslie H Cizmas; Susan D Richardson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Occurrence and Comparative Toxicity of Haloacetaldehyde Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water.

Authors:  Clara H Jeong; Cristina Postigo; Susan D Richardson; Jane Ellen Simmons; Susana Y Kimura; Benito J Mariñas; Damia Barcelo; Pei Liang; Elizabeth D Wagner; Michael J Plewa
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Seasonal and spatial evolution of trihalomethanes in a drinking water distribution system according to the treatment process.

Authors:  A Domínguez-Tello; A Arias-Borrego; Tamara García-Barrera; J L Gómez-Ariza
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Detecting Departure From Additivity Along a Fixed-Ratio Mixture Ray With a Piecewise Model for Dose and Interaction Thresholds.

Authors:  Sharon D Yeatts; Chris Gennings; Elizabeth D Wagner; Jane Ellen Simmons; Michael J Plewa
Journal:  J Agric Biol Environ Stat       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 1.524

6.  Degradation of haloacetic acids with the Fenton-like and analysis by GC-MS: use of bioassays for monitoring of genotoxic, mutagenic and cytotoxic effects.

Authors:  Amanda Oliveira Mourão; Diego Francis Silva; Mariandry Rodriguez; Thamyris Souza Torres; Elton Santos Franco; Valter Lúcio Pádua; Márcia Cristina da Silva Faria; Luiz Fernando Oliveira Maia; Jairo Lisboa Rodrigues
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Detection of genotoxic effects of drinking water disinfection by-products using Vicia faba bioassay.

Authors:  Yu Hu; Li Tan; Shao-Hui Zhang; Yu-Ting Zuo; Xue Han; Na Liu; Wen-Qing Lu; Ai-Lin Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  Trichloroethylene biotransformation and its role in mutagenicity, carcinogenicity and target organ toxicity.

Authors:  Lawrence H Lash; Weihsueh A Chiu; Kathryn Z Guyton; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 5.657

9.  Micronucleus induction by oxidative metabolites of trichloroethylene in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes: a comparative genotoxicity study.

Authors:  Meenu Varshney; Abhijit Chandra; L K S Chauhan; Sudhir K Goel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  In vitro cytogenetic assessment of trichloroacetic acid in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.

Authors:  Meenu Varshney; Abhijit Chandra; L K S Chauhan; S K Goel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.