Literature DB >> 12202469

Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. VI. Meta-analysis of calcitonin for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Ann Cranney, Peter Tugwell, Nicole Zytaruk, Vivian Robinson, Bruce Weaver, Beverley Shea, George Wells, Jonathan Adachi, Lisa Waldegger, Gordon Guyatt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the effect of calcitonin on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. DATA SOURCE: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 to 2000 and examined citations of relevant articles and the proceedings of international osteoporosis meetings. We contacted osteoporosis investigators to identify additional studies and primary authors for unpublished data. STUDY SELECTION: We included 30 studies that randomized women to calcitonin or an alternative (placebo or calcium and/or vitamin D) and measured bone density or fracture incidence for at least 1 yr. DATA EXTRACTION: For each trial, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and abstracted data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Calcitonin reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures, with a pooled relative risk (RR) of 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.87, P = 0.02, n = 1404, 4 trials]. However, the RR from the one relatively large randomized controlled trial (RCT) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.62-1.00, P = 0.05, n = 1108). For nonvertebral fractures, the pooled RR was 0.52 (95% CI 0.22-1.23, P = 0.14, n = 1481, 3 trials). Once again, the single large trial showed a less impressive effect than the smaller trials (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.09, P = 0.16, n = 1245). For bone density of the lumbar spine, the pooled weekly dose of 250 to 2800 IU per week resulted in significant increase in the weighted mean difference (WMD) of 3.74 (2.04-5.43, P < 0.01, n = 2260, 24 trials). The combined forearm showed a similar effect, with a WMD of 3.02 (95% CI 0.98-5.07, P < 0.01, n = 468, 9 trials). At the femoral neck, the pooled weighted mean difference showed a nonsignificant trend toward benefit, WMD 3.80 (95% CI -0.32-7.91, P = 0.07, 9 trials, n = 513). Methodologically weaker studies tended to show greater effects on bone density, and the lumbar spine results suggested the possibility of publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Calcitonin likely increases bone density in postmenopausal women predominantly at the lumbar spine and forearm for weekly doses of greater than 250 IU, although the true effect may be smaller than the pooled estimate would suggest. Calcitonin likely reduces the risk of vertebral fracture; its effect on nonvertebral fracture remains uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12202469     DOI: 10.1210/er.2001-6002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Rev        ISSN: 0163-769X            Impact factor:   19.871


  32 in total

1.  Efficacy and harms of nasal calcitonin in improving bone density in young patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Helen M Pappa; Tracee M Saslowsky; Rajna Filip-Dhima; Diane DiFabio; Hajar Hassani Lahsinoui; Apurva Akkad; Richard J Grand; Catherine M Gordon
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club.

Authors:  Steven Boonen; Jean-Jacques Body; Yves Boutsen; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Comparison of the effects of elcatonin and risedronate on back and knee pain by electroalgometry using fall of skin impedance and quality of life assessment using SF-36.

Authors:  Takuo Fujita; Mutsumi Ohue; Mikio Nakajima; Yoshio Fujii; Akimitsu Miyauchi; Yasuyuki Takagi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Investigation of the direct effects of salmon calcitonin on human osteoarthritic chondrocytes.

Authors:  Bodil-Cecilie Sondergaard; Suzi H Madsen; Toni Segovia-Silvestre; Sarah J Paulsen; Thorbjorn Christiansen; Christian Pedersen; Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen; Morten A Karsdal
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Management of osteoporosis in patients hospitalized for hip fractures.

Authors:  T P Ip; J Leung; A W C Kung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01

Review 7.  Cathepsin K inhibitors for osteoporosis and potential off-target effects.

Authors:  Dieter Brömme; Fabien Lecaille
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.206

Review 8.  Prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures among postmenopausal women and older men.

Authors:  Poupak Rahmani; Suzanne Morin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; N Burlet; C Cooper; P D Delmas; J-Y Reginster; F Borgstrom; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Loss of life years after a hip fracture.

Authors:  Peter Vestergaard; Lars Rejnmark; Leif Mosekilde
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.