Literature DB >> 12201979

Phonological training in children with dyslexia using temporally modified speech: a three-step pilot investigation.

Michel Habib1, Véronique Rey, Virginie Daffaure, Roselyne Camps, Robert Espesser, Barbara Joly-Pottuz, Jean-François Démonet.   

Abstract

Three separate studies were successively carried out to investigate the usefulness of intensively training children with dyslexia with daily exercizes based on the temporal processing theory of dyslexia, according to which these children would be specifically unable to process brief and rapidly changing auditory stimuli. The speech modification, similar for the three studies, was close to that proposed by Merzenich et al. (1996) and Tallal et al. (1996), including both artificial slowing of natural speech stimuli and amplification of brief, unstable portions of the speech signal. In the first study, 12 children, aged 10-12 years, received either such modified speech or normal speech for 1 h a day, 5 days a week, over 5 weeks, and they were assessed on phonological tasks before, during and after training. A significant advantage for the modified speech group was found both in pre-post-training improvement and in day-to-day progression on phonological performance. In a second study, 29 children with dyslexia, aged 5-12, received a similar training, but for only 15 min a day, 7 days a week, over 6 weeks, part at the speech therapist office, part in their own homes. The finding of comparable improvement in a more 'natural' environment and in children over a wider age range indicates both the efficacy and feasibility of the method in usual clinical practice. However, this study also showed that one of four children did not improve as expected, prompting a third study where 23 other children underwent specific tasks presumably exploring various aspects of temporal processing in order to find predictors of training efficacy. A 'temporal order judgement' (TOJ) task was found best correlated with post-training improvement, suggesting that one use this task for selecting the best candidates for temporo-phonological training. Moreover, such correlation provided further argument in favour of the temporal deficit theory of dyslexia, not only by showing a link between a purely temporal task and ultimate phonological performance, but also by demonstrating that TOJ performance itself improves after phonological training. Finally, and taken together, these studies provide further justification for a rational, indication-based temporo-phonological treatment of dyslexia. Possible neural substrates of the relevant mechanisms are discussed in the light of recent experimental and brain-imaging studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12201979     DOI: 10.1080/13682820210136278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord        ISSN: 1368-2822            Impact factor:   3.020


  6 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

2.  Does successful training of temporal processing of sound and phoneme stimuli improve reading and spelling?

Authors:  Ulrich Strehlow; Johann Haffner; Jürgen Bischof; Volker Gratzka; Peter Parzer; Franz Resch
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  Knockdown of the dyslexia-associated gene Kiaa0319 impairs temporal responses to speech stimuli in rat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A B Booker; A M Sloan; F Chen; B J Maher; R S Carraway; N Khodaparast; R Rennaker; J J LoTurco; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Neuroplasticity-based cognitive and linguistic skills training improves reading and writing skills in college students.

Authors:  Beth A Rogowsky; Pericles Papamichalis; Laura Villa; Sabine Heim; Paula Tallal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-25

5.  Speech sound processing deficits and training-induced neural plasticity in rats with dyslexia gene knockdown.

Authors:  Tracy M Centanni; Fuyi Chen; Anne M Booker; Crystal T Engineer; Andrew M Sloan; Robert L Rennaker; Joseph J LoTurco; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Strategy choice mediates the link between auditory processing and spelling.

Authors:  Tru E Kwong; Kyle J Brachman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.