Literature DB >> 12201844

Pharmaco-economics of blood transfusion safety: review of the available evidence.

M van Hulst1, J T M de Wolf, U Staginnus, E J Ruitenberg, M J Postma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pharmaco-economics provides a standardized methodology for valid comparisons of interventions in different fields of health care. The role of pharmaco-economics in the safety of blood and blood products has, however, been very limited to date. This review discusses the pharmaco-economic evaluations of strategies to enhance blood product safety that have been published in the scientific literature.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed pharmaco-economic methodology with special reference to cost-effectiveness analysis. We searched the literature for cost-effectiveness in blood product safety. RESULT: Net costs per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained varied from cost-saving for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- and hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody screening and leucoreduction to several million US dollars per QALY gained for solvent-detergent treatment of plasma, nucleic acid amplification testing and HIV p24 antigen testing.
CONCLUSIONS: To date the safety of blood transfusion has been largely determined by available technology, irrespective of pharmaco-economics. Net costs up to several million US dollars per QALY gained were found for interventions implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12201844     DOI: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2002.00198.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vox Sang        ISSN: 0042-9007            Impact factor:   2.144


  13 in total

1.  The challenge of an increasingly expensive blood system.

Authors:  Kumanan Wilson; Paul C Hébert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Economics of pathogen inactivation technology for platelet concentrates in Japan.

Authors:  Ulf Staginnus; Laurence Corash
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Depletion of resident Chlamydia pneumoniae through leukoreduction by filtration of blood for transfusion.

Authors:  Hideaki Ikejima; Herman Friedman; German F Leparc; Yoshimasa Yamamoto
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Proceedings of a Consensus Conference: pathogen inactivation-making decisions about new technologies.

Authors:  Kathryn E Webert; Christine M Cserti; Judy Hannon; Yulia Lin; Katerina Pavenski; Jacob M Pendergrast; Morris A Blajchman
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2008-01

5.  The Krever Commission--10 years later.

Authors:  Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Recommendations from the Tuscan Transfusion System on the appropriate use of solvent/detergent-inactivated fresh-frozen plasma.

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Maria Laura Sodini; Giuliano Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 7.  Clinical and economic impact of epoetins in cancer care.

Authors:  Monia Marchetti; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Can combination prevention strategies reduce HIV transmission in generalized epidemic settings in Africa? The HPTN 071 (PopART) study plan in South Africa and Zambia.

Authors:  Sten H Vermund; Sarah J Fidler; Helen Ayles; Nulda Beyers; Richard J Hayes
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Cost-effectiveness of prospective red blood cell antigen matching to prevent alloimmunization among sickle cell patients.

Authors:  Seema Kacker; Paul M Ness; William J Savage; Kevin D Frick; R Sue Shirey; Karen E King; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  The cost-effectiveness of platelet additive solution to prevent allergic transfusion reactions.

Authors:  Seema Kacker; Paul M Ness; William J Savage; Kevin D Frick; Jeffrey McCullough; Karen E King; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.