Literature DB >> 12201832

Effects of a growth hormone receptor antagonist on bone markers in acromegaly.

W P Fairfield1, G Sesmilo, L Katznelson, K Pulaski, P U Freda, S Stavrou, D Kleinberg, A Klibanski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Excess GH secretion, as occurs in acromegaly, is associated with abnormalities in bone turnover markers and bone mineral density (BMD). GH administration in GH deficient patients causes an increase in bone turnover. IGF-I mediates many of the metabolic actions of GH, although GH may have direct effects upon bone. In patients with acromegaly who are treated with a GH receptor antagonist, selective blockade of the GH receptor results in a decrease in circulating IGF-I levels in the majority of cases. We hypothesized that, in acromegaly, antagonism of GH receptors would result in a decrease in serum markers of bone turnover, including serum procollagen I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP), osteocalcin and N-telopeptide (NTx). DESIGN AND
SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven patients with acromegaly were enrolled as part of a multicentre 12-week trial of a GH receptor antagonist and were randomized to placebo (n = 7) or 10, 15 or 20 mg of pegvisomant (n = 20). MEASUREMENTS: Serum markers of bone turnover were determined at baseline and 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Baseline bone turnover markers were above the upper limit of normal in 23%, 19% and 32% of subjects for osteocalcin, PICP and NTx, respectively. During the 12-week placebo-controlled period, there were significant decreases in serum markers of bone formation, osteocalcin (-2.2 +/- 0.44 vs. placebo +0.01 +/- 0.39 nmol/l, P = 0.009) and PICP (-23.6 +/- 9.6 vs. placebo +18.1 +/- 12.8 micro g/l, P = 0.022) and a serum marker of bone resorption, NTx (-4.4 +/- 1.4, placebo +1.0 +/- 0.3 nm, P = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: Using a specific GH receptor antagonist, we found that normalization of IGF-I is associated with rapid reductions in markers of both bone formation and resorption, and that these processes remain coupled. These data confirm the highly significant effects of GH and IGF-I in modulating bone turnover. The independent contributions of GH and IGF-I to these effects and the long-term effects on BMD in this population remain to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12201832     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01624.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pegvisomant in acromegaly: why, when, how.

Authors:  A Colao; G Arnaldi; P Beck-Peccoz; S Cannavò; R Cozzi; E degli Uberti; L De Marinis; E De Menis; D Ferone; V Gasco; A Giustina; S Grottoli; G Lombardi; P Maffei; E Martino; F Minuto; R Pivonello; E Ghigo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures in "difficult" patients with acromegaly with different biochemical outcomes after multimodal treatment.

Authors:  S Chiloiro; M Mormando; A Bianchi; A Giampietro; D Milardi; C Bima; G Grande; A M Formenti; G Mazziotti; A Pontecorvi; A Giustina; L De Marinis
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Alterations in body composition in acromegaly.

Authors:  Laurence Katznelson
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 4.  Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors, and the skeleton.

Authors:  Andrea Giustina; Gherardo Mazziotti; Ernesto Canalis
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Growth hormone mediates pubertal skeletal development independent of hepatic IGF-1 production.

Authors:  Hayden-William Courtland; Hui Sun; Mordechay Beth-On; Yingjie Wu; Sebastien Elis; Clifford J Rosen; Shoshana Yakar
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Trabecular Bone Score and Osteoprotegerin as Useful Tools in the Assessment of Bone Deterioration in Acromegaly.

Authors:  Aleksandra Jawiarczyk-Przybyłowska; Jowita Halupczok-Żyła; Joanna Syrycka; Agnieszka Zembska; Justyna Kuliczkowska-Płaksej; Marek Bolanowski
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 7.  Nanomedicines in the treatment of acromegaly: focus on pegvisomant.

Authors:  Ferdinand Roelfsema; Nienke R Biermasz; Alberto M Pereira; Johannes Romijn
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2006

8.  Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  David J Moore; Yaser Adi; Martin J Connock; Sue Bayliss
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.763

9.  Use of Pegvisomant in acromegaly. An Italian Society of Endocrinology guideline.

Authors:  A Giustina; M R Ambrosio; P Beck Peccoz; F Bogazzi; S Cannavo'; L De Marinis; E De Menis; S Grottoli; R Pivonello
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.256

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.