Literature DB >> 12201623

Treatment with atorvastatin to the National Cholesterol Educational Program goal versus 'usual' care in secondary coronary heart disease prevention. The GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) study.

Vasilios G Athyros1, Athanasios A Papageorgiou, Bodosakis R Mercouris, Valasia V Athyrou, Athanasios N Symeonidis, Elias O Basayannis, Dimokritos S Demitriadis, Athanasios G Kontopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atorvastatin is very effective in reducing plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. However, there is no long-term survival study that evaluated this statin. PATIENTS-
METHODS: To assess the effect of atorvastatin on morbidity and mortality (total and coronary) of patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD), 1600 consecutive patients were randomised either to atorvastatin or to 'usual' medical care. The dose of atorvastatin was titrated from 10 to 80 mg/day, in order to reach the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goal of LDL-C <100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l). All patients were followed up for a mean period of 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoints of the study were defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, revascularisation (coronary morbidity) and stroke. Secondary endpoints were the safety and efficacy of the hypolipidaemic drugs as well as the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin.
RESULTS: The mean dosage of atorvastatin was 24 mg/day. This statin reduced total chlesterol by 36%, LDL-C by 46%, triglycerides by 31%, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) by 44%, while it increased HDL-C by 7%; all these changes were significant. The NCEP LDL-C and non-HDL-C treatment goals were reached by 95% (n = 759) and 97% (n = 776), respectively, of patients on atorvastatin. Only 14% of the 'usual' care patients received any hypolipidaemic drugs throughout the study and 3% of them reached the NCEP LDL-C treatment goal. The cost per quaility-adjusted life-year gained with atorvastatin was estimated at $US 8350. During this study 196 (24.5%) CHD patients on 'usual' care had a CHD recurrent event or died vs. 96 (12%) CHD patients on atorvastatin; risk ratio (RR) 0.49, confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.73, p < 0.0001. In detail, atorvastatin reduced, in comparison to 'usual' care, total mortality (RR 0.57, CI 0.39-0.78, p = 0.0021), coronary mortality (RR 0.53, CI 0.29-0.74, p = 0.0017), coronary morbidity (RR 0.46, CI 0.25-0.71, p < 0.0001), and stroke (RR 0.53, CI 0.30-0.82, p = 0.034). All subgroups of patients (women, those with diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, age 60 to 75 years, congestive heart failure, recent unstable angina or prior revascularisation) benefited from treatment with atorvastatin. Withdrawal of patients because of side-effects from the atorvastatin group was low (0.75%) and similar to that of the 'usual' care group (0.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment of CHD patients with atorvastatin to achieve NCEP lipid targets significantly reduces total and coronary mortality, coronary morbidity and stroke, in comparison to patients receiving 'usual' medical care. Treatment with atorvastatin is well tolerated and cost-effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12201623     DOI: 10.1185/030079902125000787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  98 in total

Review 1.  New and emerging data from clinical trials of statins.

Authors:  John C LaRosa
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Benefits of simvastin in cholesterol lowering.

Authors:  John A Farmer
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Do hypertensive patients with average cholesterol levels benefit from atorvastatin therapy?

Authors:  Daniel G Hackam
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Beneficial effects of statins on the kidney.

Authors:  B Afzali; D J A Goldsmith
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins.

Authors:  Goodarz Danaei; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Statin effects on both low-density lipoproteins and high-density lipoproteins: is there a dual benefit?

Authors:  Kiyoko Uno; Stephen J Nicholls
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  Lipid abnormalities in the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Eliot A Brinton
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  A model to assess the cost effectiveness of statins in achieving the UK National Service Framework target cholesterol levels.

Authors:  Koo Wilson; John Marriott; Stephen Fuller; Loretto Lacey; David Gillen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Atorvastatin decreases triacylglycerol-associated risk of vascular events in coronary heart disease patients.

Authors:  Vasilios G Athyros; Anna I Kakafika; Athanasios A Papageorgiou; Konstantinos Tziomalos; Athanasios Skaperdas; Efstathios Pagourelias; Athina Pirpasopoulou; Asterios Karagiannis; Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 1.880

Review 10.  Problems and possible solutions for therapy with statins.

Authors:  Thomas F Whayne
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.