Literature DB >> 12200919

Prediction of 2000 m indoor rowing performance using a 30 s sprint and maximal oxygen uptake.

Steven E Riechman1, Robert F Zoeller, G Balasekaran, Fredric L Goss, Robert J Robertson.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to predict indoor rowing performance in 12 competitive female rowers (age 21.3 +/- 3.6 years, height 1.68 +/- 0.54 m, body mass 67.1 +/- 11.7 kg; mean +/- s) using a 30 s rowing sprint, maximal oxygen uptake and the blood lactate response to submaximal rowing. Blood lactate and oxygen uptake (VO2) were measured during a discontinuous graded exercise test on a Concept II rowing ergometer incremented by 25 W for each 2 min stage; the highest VO2 measured during the test was recorded as VO2max (mean = 3.18 +/- 0.35 l.min-1). Peak power (380 +/- 63.2 W) and mean power (368 +/- 60.0 W) were determined using a modified Wingate test protocol on the Concept II rowing ergometer. Rowing performance was based on the results of the 2000 m indoor rowing championship in 1997 (466.8 +/- 12.3 s). Laboratory testing was performed within 3 weeks of the rowing championship. Submitting mean power (Power), the highest and lowest five consecutive sprint power outputs (Maximal and Minimal), percent fatigue in the sprint test (Fatigue), VO2max (l.min-1), VO2max (ml.kg-1.min-1), VO2 at the lactate threshold, power at the lactate threshold (W), maximal lactate concentration, lactate threshold (percent VO2max) and VEmax (l.min-1) to a stepwise multiple regression analysis produced the following model to predict 2000 m rowing performance: Time2000 = -0.163 (Power) -14.213.(VO2max l.min-1) +0.738.(Fatigue) 7.259 (R2 = 0.96, standard error = 2.89). These results indicate that, in the women studied, 75.7% of the variation in 2000 m indoor rowing performance time was predicted by peak power in a rowing Wingate test, while VO2max and fatigue during the Wingate test explained an additional 12.1% and 8.2% of the variance, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12200919     DOI: 10.1080/026404102320219383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  15 in total

Review 1.  Measures of rowing performance.

Authors:  T Brett Smith; Will G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Monitoring of performance and training in rowing.

Authors:  Jarek Mäestu; Jaak Jürimäe; Toivo Jürimäe
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Energy systems contributions in 2,000 m race simulation: a comparison among rowing ergometers and water.

Authors:  Fernando de Campos Mello; Rômulo Cássio de Moraes Bertuzzi; Patricia Moreno Grangeiro; Emerson Franchini
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Physiological factors to predict on traditional rowing performance.

Authors:  Mikel Izquierdo-Gabarren; Rafael González de Txabarri Expósito; Eduardo Sáez Sáez de Villarreal; Mikel Izquierdo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Tennis ranking related to exercise capacity.

Authors:  Winfried Banzer; Christian Thiel; Andreas Rosenhagen; Lutz Vogt
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-02-02

6.  Does a bout of strength training affect 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance and rowing-specific maximal power 24 h later?

Authors:  Thomas I Gee; Duncan N French; Glyn Howatson; Stephen J Payton; Nicolas J Berger; Kevin G Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Determination of critical power in trained rowers using a three-minute all-out rowing test.

Authors:  Ching-Feng Cheng; Yi-Shan Yang; Hui-Mei Lin; Chia-Lun Lee; Chun-Yi Wang
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Can the 20 and 60 s All-Out Test Predict the 2000 m Indoor Rowing Performance in Athletes?

Authors:  Dario Cerasola; Daniele Zangla; Joseph N Grima; Marianna Bellafiore; Angelo Cataldo; Marcello Traina; Laura Capranica; Nemanja Maksimovic; Patrik Drid; Antonino Bianco
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Prediction of rowing ergometer performance from functional anaerobic power, strength and anthropometric components.

Authors:  Fırat Akça
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Anthropometric determinants of rowing ergometer performance in physically inactive collegiate females.

Authors:  R Podstawski; Dj Choszcz; S Konopka; J Klimczak; M Starczewski
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.