Literature DB >> 12200406

Magnetite-based magnetoreception in birds: the effect of a biasing field and a pulse on migratory behavior.

Wolfgang Wiltschko1, Ursula Munro, Roswitha Wiltschko, Joseph L Kirschvink.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that single domain magnetite is involved in magnetoreception, we treated Australian silvereyes Zosterops l. lateralis with a strong, brief pulse designed to alter the magnetization of single domain particles. This pulse was administered in the presence of a 1 mT biasing field, either parallel to the direction of the biasing field (PAR group) or antiparallel (ANTI group). In the case of magnetoreceptors based on freely moving single domain particles, the PAR treatment should have little effect, whereas the ANTI treatment should cause remagnetization of the magnetite particles involved in a receptor and could produce a maximum change in that receptor's output for some receptor configurations. Migratory orientation was used as a criterion to assess the effect on the receptor. Before treatment, both groups preferred their normal northerly migratory direction. Exposure to the biasing field alone did not affect their behavior. Treatment with the pulse in the presence of the biasing field caused both the PAR and the ANTI birds to show an axial preference for the east-west axis, with no difference between the two groups. Although these results are in accordance with magnetite-based magnetoreceptors playing a role in migratory orientation, they do not support the hypothesis that single domains in polarity-sensitive receptors are free to move through all solid angles. Possible interpretations, including other arrangements of single domains and superparamagnetic crystals, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12200406     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.19.3031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  22 in total

Review 1.  Identifying Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms for Magnetosensation.

Authors:  Benjamin L Clites; Jonathan T Pierce
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Magnetic orientation in birds: non-compass responses under monochromatic light of increased intensity.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Ursula Munro; Hugh Ford; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Differential effects of magnetic pulses on the orientation of naturally migrating birds.

Authors:  Richard A Holland
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Towards the neural basis of magnetoreception: a neuroanatomical approach.

Authors:  Pavel Nemec; Hynek Burda; Helmut H A Oelschläger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-03-18

5.  Magnetic pulse affects a putative magnetoreceptor mechanism.

Authors:  Alfonso F Davila; Michael Winklhofer; Valera P Shcherbakov; Nikolai Petersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Magnetic orientation and magnetoreception in birds and other animals.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Photoreceptor-based magnetoreception: optimal design of receptor molecules, cells, and neuronal processing.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Margaret Ahmad; Henrik Mouritsen; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  A strong magnetic pulse affects the precision of departure direction of naturally migrating adult but not juvenile birds.

Authors:  Richard A Holland; Barbara Helm
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  A quantitative assessment of torque-transducer models for magnetoreception.

Authors:  Michael Winklhofer; Joseph L Kirschvink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Biophysics of magnetic orientation: strengthening the interface between theory and experimental design.

Authors:  Joseph L Kirschvink; Michael Winklhofer; Michael M Walker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.