Literature DB >> 12199880

The oil crisis, risk and evidence-based practice.

Michael Traynor1.   

Abstract

Evidence-based practice has risen to prominence over the last 20 years. Different professions have taken it up in different ways and for different purposes. It has been seen as holding both threats and advantages to professionalising endeavours and professional identity. It has engendered controversy but some criticisms of it have been unconvincing. It is possible to account for its rise as a response to tightening financial constraints on state spending in the west, as a sign of a culture increasingly concerned with risk, distrust of professionals and experts, as well as a way for professionals themselves to maintain control over their activity in the face of growing managerialism. This paper reviews the literature of some of the movement's proponents as well as criticism from various professional groups. It concludes that more useful than either arguing for or against it, is to understand the policy background and sociological reasons for its emergence and spread.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12199880     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2002.00153.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Inq        ISSN: 1320-7881            Impact factor:   2.393


  3 in total

1.  Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Res Sch       Date:  2006

2.  "Evidence-based dentistry in oral surgery: could we do better?".

Authors:  Pier Francesco Nocini; Giuseppe Verlato; Andrea Frustaci; Antonio de Gemmis; Giovanni Rigoni; Daniele De Santis
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2010-07-16

3.  Purity and the dangers of regenerative medicine: regulatory innovation of human tissue-engineered technology.

Authors:  Alex Faulkner; Julie Kent; Ingrid Geesink; David FitzPatrick
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 4.634

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.