Literature DB >> 12198746

Cephalometric analysis in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Part II: Prognostic value in treatment with a mandibular advancement device.

Edmund Rose1, Martin Lehner, Richard Staats, Irmtrud E Jonas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mandibular advancement device (MAD) is accepted as an additional treatment option for snoring and mild obstructive sleep disorders. Its therapeutic efficacy can only be verified through nocturnal polysomnography with the appliance in situ. The relevance of the craniofacial skeletal and soft-tissue structures as an etiological cofactor is controversial. While the lateral cephalogram of the facial skeleton is of no direct diagnostic relevance, it remains unclear to what extent cephalometric assessment can provide prognostic information to better ensure treatment success with an MAD. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This study is based on the evaluation of 57 patients diagnosed polysomnographically with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The patients were treated primarily with a modified activator; after 6-12 weeks, control polysomnography was carried out in the sleep laboratory. The cephalometric variables were analyzed using a multivariate regression procedure with the response variable of treatment outcome. In addition to a horizontal craniofacial morphology, the downward and forward posture of the hyoid is a prognostic variable for effective therapy with an MAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12198746     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-002-0058-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  6 in total

Review 1.  Anatomically Based Outcome Predictors of Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Intraoral Splint Devices: A Systematic Review of Cephalometric Studies.

Authors:  Luca Guarda-Nardini; Daniele Manfredini; Marta Mion; Gary Heir; Rosario Marchese-Ragona
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Correlation of cephalometric and anthropometric measures with obstructive sleep apnea severity.

Authors:  Paulo de Tarso M Borges; Edson Santos Ferreira Filho; Telma Maria Evangelista de Araujo; Jose Machado Moita Neto; Nubia Evangelista de Sa Borges; Baltasar Melo Neto; Viriato Campelo; Jorge Rizzato Paschoal; Li M Li
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07

Review 3.  Cephalometric predictors of treatment outcome with mandibular advancement devices in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giulio Alessandri-Bonetti; Daniela Rita Ippolito; Maria Lavinia Bartolucci; Vincenzo D'Antò; Serena Incerti-Parenti
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Subjective versus objective dental side effects from oral sleep apnea appliances.

Authors:  Marie Marklund
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 5.  A consideration of factors affecting palliative oral appliance effectiveness for obstructive sleep apnea: a scoping review.

Authors:  Bruce S Haskell; Michael J Voor; Andrew M Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Cephalometric and anthropometric data of obstructive apnea in different age groups.

Authors:  Paulo de Tarso Moura Borges; Benedito Borges da Silva; José Machado Moita Neto; Núbia Evangelista de Sá Borges; Li M Li
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.