Literature DB >> 12197597

Coronary disease morphology and distribution determined by quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound--re-evaluation in a cooperative multicenter intravascular ultrasound study (COMIUS).

Masakazu Yamagishi1, Hiroaki Hosokawa, Satoshi Saito, Seiyu Kanemitsu, Masao Chino, Samon Koyanagi, Kazushi Urasawa, Kenichi Ito, Shisei Yo, Junko Honye, Masato Nakamura, Takahiro Matsumoto, Akira Kitabatake, Noboru Takekoshi, Tetsu Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

Although previous studies have demonstrated that even quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) can not provide accurate disease morphology, there has not been a systematic comparison of disease morphology determined by QCA and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), particularly in Japanese patients. Therefore, the present study prospectively examined patients in a multicenter cooperative study. A total of 491 coronary sites from 562 patients (446 men, 116 women; mean age, 64+/-11 years) who underwent coronary interventions were enrolled. The target lesions (>50% diameter stenosis) were evaluated pre-operatively by both QCA and IVUS operating at 30-40 MHz and the percent area stenosis, eccentricity index (EI) and lesion length were determined. The minimal (min) and maximal (max) distances from the center of the stenotic lesion to the outline of the vessel wall were measured, and the EI was calculated by the formula: [(max - min)/max]. By QCA, lesion length was determined by measuring the distance between the proximal and distal shoulders of the lesion. When the lesions were observed by IVUS with a motorized pull-back system, the length was calculated by multiplying the time for observation of the disease and 0.5 or 1 mm/s. Although the severity of the stenosis determined by QCA (86+/-10%, mean +/- SD) did not differ from that by IVUS (83+/-13%), there was no correlation between them (r=0.32, y=0.25x+65) and the correlation did not improve when lesions with remodeling, enlargement (n=176) or shrinkage (n=79) were omitted from the calculation. The EIs by QCA and IVUS were 0.51+/-0.26 and 0.52+/-0.22, respectively (NS), and there was no correlation between them (r=0.30, y=0.36x+33). However, when the lesions with remodeling were excluded, the correlation greatly improved (r=0.80, y=0.84x+10.6, p<0.05). Lesion length determined by QCA (12.4+/-6.1 mm) was significantly shorter than that by IVUS (16.3+/-8.9 mm, p<0.01). These results demonstrate that coronary angiography significantly misinterprets disease morphology in terms of severity, eccentricity and length, in part because of vessel remodeling that can be accurately determined only by IVUS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12197597     DOI: 10.1253/circj.66.735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  5 in total

1.  Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis classified by computed tomography in patients with drug-eluting stents: correlation with invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Jingwei Pan; Zhigang Lu; Jiayin Zhang; Minghua Li; Meng Wei
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Consensus document for invasive coronary physiologic assessment in Asia-Pacific countries.

Authors:  Hak Seung Lee; Joo Myung Lee; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Joon-Hyung Doh; Neng Dai; Martin K C Ng; Andy S C Yong; Damras Tresukosol; Ajit S Mullasari; Rony Mathew; Praveen Chandra; Kuang-Te Wang; Yundai Chen; Jiyan Chen; Kai-Hang Yiu; Nils P Johnson; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Image-based quantification of 3D morphology for bifurcations in the left coronary artery: Application to stent design.

Authors:  Laura Ellwein; David S Marks; Raymond Q Migrino; W Dennis Foley; Sara Sherman; John F LaDisa
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Non-invasive assessment of atherosclerotic coronary lesion length using multidetector computed tomography angiography: comparison to quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  J E van Velzen; M A de Graaf; A Ciarka; F R de Graaf; M J Schalij; L J Kroft; A de Roos; J W Jukema; J H C Reiber; J D Schuijf; J J Bax; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Turbulent flow as a cause for underestimating coronary flow reserve measured by Doppler guide wire.

Authors:  Markus Ferrari; Gerald S Werner; Philipp Bahrmann; Barbara M Richartz; Hans R Figulla
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.062

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.