Literature DB >> 12197215

Contrast of response to dacarbazine, mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (DMAP) plus GM-CSF between patients with advanced malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors and patients with other advanced leiomyosarcomas.

John H Edmonson1, Randolph S Marks, Jan C Buckner, Michelle R Mahoney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous observations have suggested that leiomyosarcomas, and especially gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas, may be less responsive to cancer chemotherapy than other histologic types of non-osseous sarcomas; however, this difference has not been characterized well until quite recently, with the recognition of the special identity of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Prior to the general acceptance of this new histologic classification, we decided to study patients with gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas in concert with other leiomyosarcomas for relative responsivity to a combination cytotoxic regimen developed specifically for leiomyosarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with advanced leiomyosarcomas received intravenous chemotherapy as outpatients with dacarbazine 750 micrograms/m2, mitomycin 6 mg/m2, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2, and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 0, with granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF, sagramostim) 250 mcg/m2 given s.c. every 12 hr on days -6 to -3 and on days 1-14 of each 4-week treatment cycle. Our original plan to escalate dacarbazine doses to 1000 mg/m2 following cycle one was abandoned after the first six patients because of toxicity.
RESULTS: We studied 21 patients with GIST and 18 patients with other types of leiomyosarcomas, for a total of 131 treatment cycles, with a median of four cycles per patient in each of the two groups of patients. Toxicity was significant, with 33% having grade 3 vomiting at some time during treatment. Grade 3 leukopenia occurred in 42%, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia was observed in 68% of our patients. In one patient, grade 4 pulmonary toxicity developed during the fourth cycle, and this was considered a major factor in her death. Objective tumor regression was observed in one of 21 (1.8%) (95%CI = 0-14.5%) GIST and in 11 of 18 (61%) (95%CI = 38-84%) other leiomyosarcomas, including eight of 10 uterine cases. In five cases, we interrupted chemotherapy to attempt complete surgical excision of residual tumor, and four of the patients were rendered apparently free of disease. Median survivals for the two groups have been similar with 16.7 months (95%CI = 8.8-27.5 months) for the GIST and 17.5 mos (95%CI = 10.9-35.3%) for the other leiomyosarcomas. Three patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas are still alive more than 2 years after completing this chemotherapy and subsequent secondary surgical excision (+/- irradiation) and two of them are free of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: While this regimen is ineffective against GIST, its value against uterine leiomyosarcomas deserves further study in a larger population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12197215     DOI: 10.1081/cnv-120002485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  32 in total

1.  NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Cristina R Antonescu; Ronald P DeMatteo; Kristen N Ganjoo; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; Chandrajit P Raut; Richard F Riedel; Scott Schuetze; Hema M Sundar; Jonathan C Trent; Jeffrey D Wayne
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Chronic therapy in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): the big gap between theory and practice.

Authors:  Maristella Saponara; Maria Abbondanza Pantaleo; Margherita Nannini; Guido Biasco
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  Accomplishments in 2008 in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Daniel Renouf; Jean-Yves Blay; Charles Blanke
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09

4.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors-diagnosis and management: a brief review.

Authors:  Stephen T Gerrish; James W Smith
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): point mutations matter in management, a review.

Authors:  Peter J Oppelt; Angela C Hirbe; Brian A Van Tine
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

Review 6.  Trabectedin: novel insights in the treatment of advanced sarcoma.

Authors:  Jay Patrick Lopez; Csaba Gajdos; Anthony Elias
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Updates on the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Zubin M Bamboat; Ronald P Dematteo
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 8.  Regorafenib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: clinical evidence and place in therapy.

Authors:  Danielle Ferraro; John Zalcberg
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Ronald P DeMatteo
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for gastrointestinal stromal tumors with liver metastases.

Authors:  Guang Cao; Jian Li; Lin Shen; Xu Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.