Literature DB >> 12196773

Biliary decompression by nasobiliary catheter or biliary stent in acute suppurative cholangitis: a prospective randomized trial.

Danny W H Lee1, Angus C W Chan, Yuk-Hoi Lam, Enders K W Ng, James Y W Lau, Bonita K B Law, Chi-wai Lai, Joseph J Y Sung, S C Sydney Chung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic drainage has replaced emergent surgery for biliary decompression in patients with acute cholangitis. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the efficacy of the nasobiliary catheter and indwelling stent as temporary measures for biliary decompression in acute suppurative cholangitis caused by bile duct stones.
METHODS: Over a 60-month period, 79 patients with acute cholangitis who required emergent endoscopic drainage were recruited. Indications for urgent drainage included any one of the following: temperature greater than 39 degrees C, septic shock with systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg, increasing abdominal pain, and impaired level of consciousness. Patients who had previously undergone sphincterotomy or had coexisting intrahepatic duct stones were excluded. After successful bile duct cannulation, patients were randomized to receive either a nasobiliary catheter or indwelling stent without sphincterotomy for biliary decompression. Outcome measures included procedure time, complications, clinical response, and patient discomfort (scored with a 10-cm, unscaled visual analog score).
RESULTS: Of the 79 patients, 5 were excluded because of previous sphincterotomy and intrahepatic duct stones, 40 were randomized to receive a nasobiliary catheter (NBC group), and 34 to receive indwelling stent (stent group). Demographic data were similar between the groups. All procedures were successful in the NBC group; there was one failure in the stent group. The mean (SD) procedure time was similar (NBC group 14.0 [9.3] minutes vs. stent group 11.4 [7.2] min). There were 2 ERCP-related complications in the NBC group. Four patients pulled out the nasobiliary catheter and one catheter became kinked. One stent occluded. There was a significantly lower mean (SD) patient discomfort score on day 1 after the procedure in the stent group (stent group 1.8 [2.6] vs. NBC group 3.9 [2.7]; p = 0.02 t test). The overall mortality rate was 6.8% (2.5% NBC group vs. 12% stent group).
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic biliary decompression by nasobiliary catheter or indwelling stent was equally effective for patients with acute suppurative cholangitis caused by bile duct stones. The indwelling stent was associated with less postprocedure discomfort and avoided the potential problem of inadvertent removal of the nasobiliary catheter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12196773     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70039-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  25 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic papillotomy, syn. sphincterotomy: results from the past two years.

Authors:  Meinhard Classen; Peter Born
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-04

2.  Ultrasound-guided endoscopic biliary drainage: a useful drainage method for biliary decompression in patients with biliary obstructions.

Authors:  Xiang Wu Jiang; Shao Hui Tang; Jian Quan Yang; Wei Huang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Triggering receptor in myeloid cells (TREM-1) specific expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of sepsis patients with acute cholangitis.

Authors:  Rui Liao; Zuojin Liu; Sidong Wei; Faliang Xu; Zhenzhen Chen; Jianping Gong
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.092

4.  Endoscopic biliary drainage by 7 Fr or 10 Fr stent placement in patients with acute cholangitis.

Authors:  B C Sharma; N Agarwal; P Sharma; S K Sarin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Prevention of pancreatitis after papillary balloon dilatation by nasobiliary drainage: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiao-Dan Xu; Jian-Jun Dai; Jian-Qing Qian; Wei-Jun Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Endoscopic management of acute cholangitis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Naresh Agarwal; Barjesh Chander Sharma; Shiv K Sarin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Acute bacterial cholangitis.

Authors:  Mamta K Jain; Rajeev Jain
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04

8.  Techniques of biliary drainage for acute cholangitis: Tokyo Guidelines.

Authors:  Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Tadahiro Takada; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Yuji Nimura; Keita Wada; Masato Nagino; Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Fumihiko Miura; Atsushi Tanaka; Yuichi Yamashita; Masahiko Hirota; Koichi Hirata; Hideki Yasuda; Yasutoshi Kimura; Steven Strasberg; Henry Pitt; Markus W Büchler; Horst Neuhaus; Jacques Belghiti; Eduardo de Santibanes; Sheung-Tat Fan; Kui-Hin Liau; Vibul Sachakul
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-01-30

9.  Methods and timing of biliary drainage for acute cholangitis: Tokyo Guidelines.

Authors:  Masato Nagino; Tadahiro Takada; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Yuji Nimura; Yuichi Yamashita; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Keita Wada; Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Fumihiko Miura; Steven M Strasberg; Henry A Pitt; Jacques Belghiti; Sheung-Tat Fan; Kui-Hin Liau; Giulio Belli; Xiao-Ping Chen; Edward Cheuck-Seen Lai; Benny P Philippi; Harjit Singh; Avinash Supe
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-01-30

10.  Pancreas sparing duodenectomy as an emergency procedure.

Authors:  Piotr Paluszkiewicz; Wojciech Dudek; Kathryn Lowery; Colin A Hart
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.