False-positive helical CT findings of multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: is attenuation of tumor useful for diagnosing enhanced lesions?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze helical CT false-positive multifocal breast cancers and to assess the relevance of the attenuation of tumors for diagnosing enhanced lesions.
METHODS: Helical CT studies of 156 invasive breast cancers before breast conserving surgery were examined. A lesion was defined as positive if focal enhancement was detected by CT within 100 seconds after contrast material administration. The attenuation and enhancement percent ratio [(post-contrast value/pre-contrast value)%] were obtained. Attenuation of false-positive and malignant lesions was compared.
RESULTS: Helical CT enabled the detection of all 156 invasive tumors with 95 intraductal tumor extensions. The sensitivity and specificity of multifocal/multicentric disease detection by helical CT were 69% and 90%, respectively. False-positive multifocal/multicentric findings were obtained in 11 (7%) of 156 cases. The mean value of the enhancement percent ratio of the index tumors was 237%. Significant differences in the attenuation on post-contrast enhanced scans between the enhanced lesions (index tumors; mean, 82 HU), the true-positive multifocal/multicentric lesions (mean, 73 HU), the false-positive multifocal/multicentric lesions (mean, 87 HU) and normal breast tissue (mean, 32 HU) were found (p<0.0001). The attenuation of the true-positive multifocal/multicentric lesions on post-contrast enhanced scans was significantly less than that of the false-positive multifocal/multicentric lesions (p=0.03).
CONCLUSION: Attenuation of tumor is not useful for differential diagnosis of enhanced lesions on helical CT of the breast. The presence of enhancement alone does not always indicate a malignant lesion.