Literature DB >> 12196035

Global trends in migraine care: results from the MAZE survey.

Jan Lewis Brandes1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with migraine do not consult a physician, or do not achieve adequate relief after consulting a physician because of undertreatment. The objective of the Migraine and Zomig Evaluation study was to provide insights into the management of migraine in the general population.
METHODS: In phase I, 5553 members of the general public in the UK, France, Germany, Italy, and the US were interviewed by telephone and classified according to International Headache Society criteria. The Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) questionnaire was used to assess the impact of migraine on work, home and social lives. In phase II, 516 patients with clinically diagnosed migraine were interviewed to assess the impact of migraine on daily life, attitudes towards migraine, perceptions of current treatments and aspirations for future treatments.
RESULTS: In phase I, the average prevalence of migraine over the five countries was 9%. Migraine posed a significant burden in terms of the impact on patients' daily lives, and attack severity and frequency. However, medical consultation rates were low; reasons for this included patients not recognising that they had migraine or having low expectations about treatment benefits. On average, only 10% of patients who had consulted a physician had been prescribed a triptan. Only 22% of participants in phase II thought that migraine did not markedly affect their lives. In each of the five countries, > or = 50% of patients required bed rest to manage migraine attacks, demonstrating the impact of migraine-related disability on patients' lives. Assessment of MIDAS scores confirmed the debilitating effect of migraine; > 50% of respondents had a MIDAS grade of III or IV, indicating moderate or severe disability. Less than one-third of patients reported that their current medication was consistently effective and only 36% were 'very satisfied' with their current therapy. High efficacy and rapid pain relief were rated as the most important attributes of migraine medications. When asked which formulation they would like to see more of, most patients chose a tablet that dissolves in the mouth without the need to take liquids.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that migraine patients worldwide are still not receiving adequate treatment and there remains a significant unmet need in migraine care. The challenge for the future is to diagnose migraine early and offer patients effective migraine-specific therapies. Physicians particularly need to reach patients who do not realise they have migraine and those who have lapsed from care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12196035     DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200216001-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  20 in total

1.  Undiagnosed migraine headaches. A comparison of symptom-based and reported physician diagnosis.

Authors:  R B Lipton; W F Stewart; D D Celentano; M L Reed
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-06

2.  Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  W F Stewart; R B Lipton; D D Celentano; M L Reed
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Triptans in migraine: a comparative review of pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and efficacy.

Authors:  P Tfelt-Hansen; P De Vries; P R Saxena
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a population-based sample of headache sufferers.

Authors:  W F Stewart; R B Lipton; K Kolodner; J Liberman; J Sawyer
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.292

5.  Stratified care vs step care strategies for migraine: the Disability in Strategies of Care (DISC) Study: A randomized trial.

Authors:  R B Lipton; W F Stewart; A M Stone; M J Láinez; J P Sawyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Medical consultation for migraine: results from the American Migraine Study.

Authors:  R B Lipton; W F Stewart; D Simon
Journal:  Headache       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 7.  Epidemiology of headache.

Authors:  B K Rasmussen
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.292

8.  A nationwide survey of migraine in France: prevalence and clinical features in adults. GRIM.

Authors:  P Henry; P Michel; B Brochet; J F Dartigues; S Tison; R Salamon
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.292

9.  Prevalence of adult migraine in general practice.

Authors:  J Winnem
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.292

10.  Impact of migraine in the United States: data from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  P E Stang; J T Osterhaus
Journal:  Headache       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.887

View more
  14 in total

1.  Adverse reactions related to drugs for headache treatment: clinical impact.

Authors:  Anna Ferrari; Alessandra Ottani; Alfio Bertolini; Arrigo Francesco Giuseppe Cicero; Ciro Pio Rosario Coccia; Sheila Leone; Emilio Sternieri
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Erenumab Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA for Patients with Chronic Migraine Attacks in Greece.

Authors:  Theodoros V Giannouchos; Dimos-Dimitrios Mitsikostas; Robert L Ohsfeldt; Athanassios Vozikis; Paraskevi Koufopoulou
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Migraine and functional impairment.

Authors:  Jan Lewis Brandes
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Prevention of episodic migraines with topiramate: results from a non-interventional study in a general practice setting.

Authors:  Gereon Nelles; Lukas Schmitt; Thomas Humbert; Veit Becker; Petra Sandow; Karin Bornhoevd; Dirk Fritzsche; Barbara Schäuble
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 5.  Assessing and managing all aspects of migraine: migraine attacks, migraine-related functional impairment, common comorbidities, and quality of life.

Authors:  Dawn C Buse; Marcia F T Rupnow; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Topiramate: the evidence for its therapeutic value in the prevention of migraine.

Authors:  Carole Nadin
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2005-06-30

7.  Measuring the impact of migraine for evaluating outcomes of preventive treatments for migraine headaches.

Authors:  Sally Mannix; Anne Skalicky; Dawn C Buse; Pooja Desai; Sandhya Sapra; Brian Ortmeier; Katherine Widnell; Asha Hareendran
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Depression of home cage wheel running: a reliable and clinically relevant method to assess migraine pain in rats.

Authors:  Ram Kandasamy; Andrea T Lee; Michael M Morgan
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 9.  A critical review of manual therapy use for headache disorders: prevalence, profiles, motivations, communication and self-reported effectiveness.

Authors:  Craig S Moore; David W Sibbritt; Jon Adams
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Topiramate in the prevention of migraine: a review of its efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability.

Authors:  Domenico D'Amico; Licia Grazzi; Gennaro Bussone
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.