Literature DB >> 12195984

Electrical phosphenes: on the influence of conductivity inhomogeneities and small-scale structures of the orbita on the current density threshold of excitation.

G Lindenblatt1, J Silny.   

Abstract

Electrical and magnetic phosphenes, perceptions of light as a result of non-adequate stimulation of the eye by electrical current or magnetic induction, respectively, are one of the cornerstones to justify limit values for extreme low-frequency fields specified by statutory regulations. However, the mechanism and place of action, as well as the excitation threshold, remain unknown until now. We suggest that the origin of phosphene excitation is the synaptic layer of the eye. The current density threshold value for electrical phosphene excitation was numerically quantified for this area on the basis of a detailed geometrical model in original submillimetre resolution and specifically measured conductivities in the LF range. The threshold values found were 1.8 A m-2 at 60 Hz and 0.3 A m-2 at 25 Hz. These values are comparable with values of other excitable tissues. It has been shown that the current density threshold for phosphene generation depends on small-scale structures not taken into account by previous models.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195984     DOI: 10.1007/bf02344219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  12 in total

1.  Inter-laboratory comparison of numerical dosimetry for human exposure to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields.

Authors:  M A Stuchly; O P Gandhi
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  A model of the electrical volume conductor in the region of the eye in the ELF range.

Authors:  G Lindenblatt; J Silny
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A NEW INTERACTION OF LIGHT AND ELECTRICITY IN STIMULATING THE HUMAN RETINA.

Authors:  G S BRINDLEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The site of electrical excitation of the human eye.

Authors:  G S BRINDLEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1955-01-28       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Orbital phlebography. II. Anatomy of superior ophthalmic vein and its tributaries.

Authors:  J Brismar
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1974-09

6.  [Electric stimulation of the retina in ophthalmologic differential diagnosis].

Authors:  A Meier-Koll
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 1.411

7.  Magnetophosphenes: a quantitative analysis of thresholds.

Authors:  P Lövsund; P A Oberg; S E Nilsson; T Reuter
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Sensitivity of the human eye to power frequency electric fields.

Authors:  E L Carstensen; A Buettner; V L Genberg; M W Miller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Magneto- and electrophosphenes: a comparative study.

Authors:  P Lövsund; P A Oberg; S E Nilsson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  4 in total

1.  Design of electrodes and current limits for low frequency electrical impedance tomography of the brain.

Authors:  O Gilad; L Horesh; D S Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Safety Aspects, Tolerability and Modeling of Retinofugal Alternating Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Linus Haberbosch; Abhishek Datta; Chris Thomas; Andreas Jooß; Arvid Köhn; Maria Rönnefarth; Michael Scholz; Stephan A Brandt; Sein Schmidt
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Amplitude modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-TACS) efficacy evaluation via phosphene induction.

Authors:  Carsten Thiele; Tino Zaehle; Aiden Haghikia; Philipp Ruhnau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Near death experiences: a multidisciplinary hypothesis.

Authors:  István Bókkon; Birendra N Mallick; Jack A Tuszynski
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.