Literature DB >> 12195920

Creativity under the gun.

Teresa M Amabile1, Constance N Hadley, Steven J Kramer.   

Abstract

If you're like most managers, you've worked with people who swear they do their most creative work under tight deadlines. You may use pressure as a management technique, believing it will spur people on to great leaps of insight. You may even manage yourself this way. If so, are you right? Not necessarily, these researchers say. There are instances where ingenuity flourishes under extreme time pressure--for instance, a NASA team within hours comes up with a primitive but effective fix for the failing air filtration system aboard Apollo 13. But when creativity is under the gun, it usually ends up getting killed, the authors say. They recently took a close look at how people experience time pressure, collecting and analyzing more than 9,000 daily diary entries from individuals who were working on projects that required high levels of creativity and measuring their ability to innovate under varying levels of time pressure. The authors describe common characteristics of time pressure and outline four working environments under which creativity may or may not flourish. High-pressure days that still yield creativity are full of focus and meaningful urgency--people feel like they are on a mission. High-pressure days that yield no creativity lack such focus--people feel like they are on a treadmill, forced to switch gears often. On low-pressure days that yield creativity, people feel like they are on an expedition--exploring ideas rather than just identifying problems. And on low-pressure days that yield no creative thinking, people work on autopilot--doing their jobs without engaging too deeply. Managers should avoid extreme time pressure when possible; after all, complex cognitive processing takes time. For when they can't, the authors suggest ways to mollify its effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harv Bus Rev        ISSN: 0017-8012


  7 in total

1.  Competitive science: is competition ruining science?

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Joy and challenges in improving chronic illness care: capturing daily experiences of academic primary care teams.

Authors:  Julie K Johnson; Donna M Woods; David P Stevens; Judith L Bowen; Lloyd P Provost; Connie S Sixta; Ed H Wagner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Deliberate learning in health care: the effect of importing best practices and creative problem solving on hospital performance improvement.

Authors:  Ingrid M Nembhard; Praseetha Cherian; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Spotlight on the Effect of Workplace Ostracism on Creativity: A Social Cognitive Perspective.

Authors:  Ming Tu; Zhihui Cheng; Wenxing Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-29

5.  Make it complicated: a qualitative study utilizing a complexity framework to explain improvement in health care.

Authors:  Marie Höjriis Storkholm; Pamela Mazzocato; Carl Savage
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Promoting teaching innovation of Chinese public-school teachers by team temporal leadership: The mediation of job autonomy and the moderation of work stress.

Authors:  Kai Li; Guiqin Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Øystein Tønnessen; Amandeep Dhir; Bjørn-Tore Flåten
Journal:  Technol Forecast Soc Change       Date:  2021-05-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.