Literature DB >> 12195072

Using the dallas pain questionnaire to classify individuals with low back pain in a working population.

Anna Ozguler1, Alice Guéguen, Annette Leclerc, Marie-France Landre, Michèle Piciotti, Sylvie Le Gall, Michel Morel-Fatio, François Boureau.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Individuals with low back pain were classified by cluster analysis of their responses to the Dallas Pain Questionnaire. These results enabled development of an alternative simple classification tool that yielded results close to those obtained by the cluster analysis.
OBJECTIVES: To use the Dallas Pain Questionnaire to classify workers with low back pain, and to develop a practical classification tool for physicians. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The severity of low back pain is important information for patient management. Questionnaires exploring the multidimensional aspect of low back pain have been used to classify individuals with low back pain. The Dallas Pain Questionnaire is a short self-administered questionnaire that explores the functional and emotional aspects of chronic low back pain. It was tested in a population still at work using a simplified scoring system.
METHODS: The study included 765 persons with low back pain still at work who completed the self-administered questionnaire. Of these patients, 732 could be classified by cluster analysis according to their answers to the Dallas Pain Questionnaire. A classification tool was developed to categorize them. Using external variables, the groups thus formed were compared.
RESULTS: Respondents were classified into four classes: class 1 (minor disability), class 2 (intermediate disability), class 3 (disability for some physical activities), and class 4 (physical disability and emotional disturbance). External pain-related variables were clearly associated with increasing low back pain severity as measured by this classification tool.
CONCLUSIONS: The Dallas Pain Questionnaire discriminated between different groups of persons with low back pain. The proposed classification uses a short, simple practical tool to assess different levels of low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195072     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200208150-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evaluation of a Dallas Pain Questionnaire classification in relation to outcome in lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Determinants of cost-effectiveness in lumbar spinal fusion using the net benefit framework: a 2-year follow-up study among 695 patients.

Authors:  Rikke Soegaard; Cody E Bünger; Terkel Christiansen; Finn B Christensen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Physiotherapy movement based classification approaches to low back pain: comparison of subgroups through review and developer/expert survey.

Authors:  Nicholas V Karayannis; Gwendolen A Jull; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Investigating the effects of volar wrist cock-up splint and dorsal lock wrist hand orthosis in reducing signs of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Behshid Farahmand; Ensieh Pourhosaingholi; Azam Bagheri
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2021-04-24

6.  Work Ability and Quality of Life in Patients with Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Chang; Chang-Ming Yeh; Shu-Ling Huang; Chi-Chung Ho; Ren-Hau Li; Wei-Hsun Wang; Feng-Cheng Tang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.