Literature DB >> 12194929

Commutability assessment of potential reference materials using a multicenter split-patient-sample between-field-methods (twin-study) design: study within the framework of the Dutch project "Calibration 2000".

Henk Baadenhuijsen1, Herman Steigstra, Christa Cobbaert, Aldy Kuypers, Cas Weykamp, Rob Jansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Dutch project "Calibration 2000" aims at harmonization of laboratory results via calibration by development of commutable, matrix-based, secondary reference materials. An alternative approach to the NCCLS EP14 protocol for studying commutability of reference materials is presented, the "twin-study design", which in essence is a multicenter, split-patient-sample, between-field-methods protocol.
METHODS: The study consisted of the simultaneous analysis of fresh patient sera and potential reference materials (PRMs) for HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) by 86 laboratories forming 43 laboratory couples. Six subgroups of method combinations were formed. The patient sera were selected and interchanged by each laboratory couple. The PRMs consisted of three types: C37, prepared according to the NCCLS C37 protocol; Fro, frozen selectively pooled human serum; and Lyo, which was the same serum pool as Fro but lyophilized in the presence of sucrose. All PRMs were provided in three HDL-C concentrations. The regression line residuals for the PRMs were normalized by expressing them as multiples of the state-of-the-art within laboratory SD (SD(SA)). In addition, the extra contribution of each PRM to the total measurement uncertainty, CV(Netto), was calculated.
RESULTS: Averaged over the three PRM concentrations, 1.6% of the C37 residuals were outside the 3 SD(SA) limit. For the Fro and Lyo PRMs, these values were 2.4% and 11.1%. CV(Netto) values for C37, Fro, and Lyo were 2.9%, 4.3%, and 5.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The present twin-study design, as a practical alternative to the NCCLS EP14 protocol, is a viable way of studying commutability characteristics of PRMs. The study suggests that the C37 PRMs are the best candidates for a future reference material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12194929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  3 in total

1.  Reference materials and commutability.

Authors:  Hubert W Vesper; W Gregory Miller; Gary L Myers
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2007-11

2.  Reference distributions for apolipoproteins AI and B and B/AI ratios: comparison of a large cohort to the world's literature.

Authors:  Robert F Ritchie; Glenn E Palomaki; Louis M Neveux; Thomas B Ledue; Santica Marcovina; Olga Navolotskaia
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Standardization in laboratory medicine: Two years' experience from category 1 EQA programs in Spain.

Authors:  Carmen Ricós; Carmen Perich; Beatriz Boned; Elisabet González-Lao; Jorge Diaz-Garzón; Montserrat Ventura; Sandra Bullich; Zoraida Corte; Joana Minchinela; Fernando Marques; Margarita Simón; Virtudes Alvarez; José-Vicente García-Lario; Pilar Fernández-Fernández; Pilar Fernández-Calle
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.