Literature DB >> 12194664

Epidemiological and genetic study of 121 cases of oral clefts in Kuwait.

S A al-Bustan1, M M el-Zawahri, A M al-Adsani, R L Bang, I Ghunaim, B S Maher, S Weinberg, M L Marazita.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study was to ascertain some epidemiological factors such as sex and consanguinity that may be associated with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL +/- CP) in Kuwait as well as to conduct genetic segregation analysis of these families. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A total of 113 families ascertained through 121 CL +/- CP and CP surgical probands in Kuwait. The frequencies of cleft types and the epidemiological variables were calculated using SPSS version 5.0 software. Chi-square for goodness-of-fit test was used to test the significance of the associated epidemiological variables to facial clefts. Genetic segregation analysis was performed on 76 families with extended pedigrees and included only those with non-syndromic CL +/- CP (NS CL +/- CP). Major locus segregation analysis was used to fit models to the observed family patterns under Class A regressive models as implemented by REGD routine in S.A.G.E. release 4.0. A test for heterogeneity was also conducted to complete data set in addition to two subsets: Arabs and nomads.
RESULTS: Of the 121 patients, 34(28.1%) had CP, 30(24.8%) had CL and 57 (47.1%) had CL + CP. The male to female ratio was 0.89 for CP, 1.14 for CL, 1.35 for CL + CP and 1.2 for all the clefts. The percentage of consanguineous families among those with a positive family history (60%) was not significantly different from that of the general population (54.3%), whereas for all the families with clefts the percent consanguineous was significantly lower (38%). No evidence of heterogeneity in the results between the Arab and nomad subsets was observed. The results for the major locus segregation analysis were inconclusive.
CONCLUSION: No definite association was observed between consanguinity and the occurrence of facial clefts in Kuwait. General transmission models in the full data set showed no evidence of heterogeneity in the results between the Arab and nomad subsets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12194664     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2002.02203.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  6 in total

1.  Prevalence of orofacial clefts in Saudi Arabia and neighboring countries: A systematic review.

Authors:  Heba Jafar Sabbagh; Peter Anthony Mossey; Nicola P T Innes
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2011-12-02

2.  Pattern of craniofacial anomalies seen in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Aljohar Aziza; Ravichandran Kandasamy; Subhani Shazia
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

3.  Birth prevalence of non-syndromic orofacial clefts in Saudi Arabia and the effects of parental consanguinity.

Authors:  Heba J Sabbagh; Nicola P Innes; Bahauddin I Sallout; Najlaa M Alamoudi; Mustafa A Hamdan; Nasir Alhamlan; Amaal I Al-Khozami; Fatma D Abdulhameed; Jumana Y Al-Aama; Peter A Mossey
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Cleft lip and palate in southwestern Iran: an epidemiologic study of live births.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossain Rajabian; Shahin Aghaei
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

5.  Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs.

Authors:  Ghazi O Tadmouri; Pratibha Nair; Tasneem Obeid; Mahmoud T Al Ali; Najib Al Khaja; Hanan A Hamamy
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Craniofacial Anomaly Association with the Internal Malformations in the Pediatric Age Group in Al-Fallujah City-Iraq.

Authors:  Thaer M Farhan; Basim A Al-Abdely; Abdulrahman N Abdullateef; Abdulhameed S Jubair
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.