BACKGROUND: The effect of limb-length on weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is controversial; hence, the optimal limb-lengths have not been determined. This study evaluated the effect of different limb-lengths on weight loss after RYGBP. METHODS: The study was a prospective randomized clinical trial in which patients undergoing RYGBP (110 F, 24 M; mean age 39.7) were randomized as follows: BMI < or = 50 (N = 69): A-75 cm (N = 35) vs B-150 cm alimentary limb (N = 34) and C-150 cm (N = 33) vs D-250 cm alimentary limb (N = 31). All other aspects of the operation were identical. Patients were followed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, race, initial BMI, or excess weight between patients assigned to groups A vs B and C vs D. Postoperative nutritional intake was also similar between groups. Within each weight category, there were no differences in mean weight loss, change in BMI, and % excess weight lost (EWL) over time. When the number of patients achieving 50% EWL was evaluated, there was no difference between groups with a BMI < or = 50 kg/m2; however, among patients with a BMI > 50 kg/m2, a significantly greater percentage of those having a 250-cm limb achieved > 50% EWL at 18 months postoperatively. This difference was lost at 24 and 36 months, possibly due to the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a BMI < or = 50, there appears to be no advantage to longer limb-lengths. In patients with BMI > 50, however, these data suggest that longer alimentary limb-lengths may be associated with a higher percent of patients achieving > 50% EWL. Longer follow-up studies of the effects of limb-length on success of RYGBP are indicated.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The effect of limb-length on weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is controversial; hence, the optimal limb-lengths have not been determined. This study evaluated the effect of different limb-lengths on weight loss after RYGBP. METHODS: The study was a prospective randomized clinical trial in which patients undergoing RYGBP (110 F, 24 M; mean age 39.7) were randomized as follows: BMI < or = 50 (N = 69): A-75 cm (N = 35) vs B-150 cm alimentary limb (N = 34) and C-150 cm (N = 33) vs D-250 cm alimentary limb (N = 31). All other aspects of the operation were identical. Patients were followed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, race, initial BMI, or excess weight between patients assigned to groups A vs B and C vs D. Postoperative nutritional intake was also similar between groups. Within each weight category, there were no differences in mean weight loss, change in BMI, and % excess weight lost (EWL) over time. When the number of patients achieving 50% EWL was evaluated, there was no difference between groups with a BMI < or = 50 kg/m2; however, among patients with a BMI > 50 kg/m2, a significantly greater percentage of those having a 250-cm limb achieved > 50% EWL at 18 months postoperatively. This difference was lost at 24 and 36 months, possibly due to the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a BMI < or = 50, there appears to be no advantage to longer limb-lengths. In patients with BMI > 50, however, these data suggest that longer alimentary limb-lengths may be associated with a higher percent of patients achieving > 50% EWL. Longer follow-up studies of the effects of limb-length on success of RYGBP are indicated.
Authors: J Ybarra; E Bobbioni-Harsch; G Chassot; O Huber; Ph Morel; F Assimacopoulos-Jeannet; A Golay Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-10-31 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Ioannis Hatzaras; Teviah E Sachs; Matthew Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Bestoun Ahmed; Wendy C King; William Gourash; Amanda Hinerman; Steven H Belle; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Anita P Courcoulas Journal: Surgery Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.982