Literature DB >> 12194536

Determination of an optimal dosage regimen using a Bayesian decision analysis of efficacy and adverse effect data.

Gordon Graham1, Suneel Gupta, Leon Aarons.   

Abstract

One of the aims of Phase II clinical trials is to determine the dosage regimen(s) that will be investigated during a confirmatory Phase III clinical trial. During Phase II, pharmacodynamic data are collected that enables the efficacy and safety of the drug to be assessed. It is proposed in this paper to use Bayesian decision analysis to determine the optimal dosage regimen based on efficacy and toxicity of the drug oxybutynin used in the treatment of urinary urge incontinence. Such an approach results in a general framework allowing modeling, inference and decision making to be carried out. For oxybutynin, the repeated measurement efficacy and toxicity data were modeled using nonlinear hierarchical models and inferences were based on posterior probabilities. The optimal decision in this problem was to determine the dosage regimen that maximized the posterior expected utility given the prior information on the model parameters and the patient response data. The utility function was defined using clinical opinion on the satisfactory levels of efficacy and toxicity and then combined by weighting the relative importance of each pharmacodynamic response. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methodology implemented in Win-BUGS 1.3 was used to obtain posterior estimates of the model parameters, probabilities and utilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12194536     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015720718875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  10 in total

1.  Population modelling in drug development.

Authors:  L Sheiner; J Wakefield
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Decision theoretic designs for phase II clinical trials with multiple outcomes.

Authors:  N Stallard; P F Thall; J Whitehead
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Building population pharmacokinetic--pharmacodynamic models. I. Models for covariate effects.

Authors:  J W Mandema; D Verotta; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-10

4.  Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data.

Authors:  M L Lindstrom; D M Bates
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Quantitative characterization of therapeutic index: application of mixed-effects modeling to evaluate oxybutynin dose-efficacy and dose-side effect relationships.

Authors:  S K Gupta; G Sathyan; E A Lindemulder; P L Ho; L B Sheiner; L Aarons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  The use of oxybutynin in urological practice.

Authors:  Z Kirkali; R H Whitaker
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Pharmacokinetics of an oral once-a-day controlled-release oxybutynin formulation compared with immediate-release oxybutynin.

Authors:  S K Gupta; G Sathyan
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.126

9.  Bayesian optimal design in population models for haematologic data.

Authors:  J L Palmer; P Müller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Oxybutynin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and its therapeutic use in detrusor instability.

Authors:  Y E Yarker; K L Goa; A Fitton
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.923

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Propagation of population pharmacokinetic information using a Bayesian approach: comparison with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aristides Dokoumetzidis; Leon Aarons
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Combining MCMC with 'sequential' PKPD modelling.

Authors:  David Lunn; Nicky Best; David Spiegelhalter; Gordon Graham; Beat Neuenschwander
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  The use of clinical utility assessments in early clinical development.

Authors:  Anis A Khan; Itay Perlstein; Rajesh Krishna
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modelling of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibitors.

Authors:  Cornelia B Landersdorfer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Pharmacodynamic models for discrete data.

Authors:  Ines Paule; Pascal Girard; Gilles Freyer; Michel Tod
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Cornelia B Landersdorfer; William J Jusko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  A two-part mixture model for longitudinal adverse event severity data.

Authors:  Kenneth G Kowalski; Lynn McFadyen; Matthew M Hutmacher; Bill Frame; Raymond Miller
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the effectiveness and safety of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats.

Authors:  Ashraf Yassen; Erik Olofsen; Jingmin Kan; Albert Dahan; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacology: special safety considerations in drug development and pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Kwame N Atuah; Dyfrig Hughes; Munir Pirmohamed
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of adverse effects of anti-cancer drug treatment.

Authors:  A H M de Vries Schultink; A A Suleiman; J H M Schellens; J H Beijnen; A D R Huitema
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.