Literature DB >> 12193930

The differential diagnostic potential of a panel of tumor markers (CA 125, CA 15-3, and CA 72-4 antigens) in patients with a pelvic mass.

Eltjo M J Schutter1, Elvira M Davelaar, Gerard J van Kamp, Rob A Verstraeten, Peter Kenemans, René H M Verheijen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the differential diagnostic potential of a combination of CA 125, CA 15-3, and CA 72-4 antigens in the definition of malignant disease, especially ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass. STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 412 patients were evaluated in a multicenter, retrospective study.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six malignant, 171 benign pelvic tumors (of which 129 were benign ovarian tumors), and 15 borderline tumors were evaluated. One hundred thirty-three patients had ovarian carcinoma. In 76 cases (55%), the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage was III or IV. Borderline tumors (n = 15) were excluded from the statistical calculations. CA 125 antigen was the most sensitive marker for ovarian carcinoma (81%). The highest specificity and positive predictive value was obtained with CA 15-3 antigen (95% and 92%, respectively). Considering a concomitant elevation of all 3 markers as positive, a positive predictive value of 97% was found. However, only 28% of the patients in the total group and 41% of the patients with ovarian carcinoma had a concomitant elevation of all 3 markers. The combination of all 3 markers with levels below the cut-off resulted in a (false-positive) positive predictive value for malignancy between 12% and 36%. With the use of logistic regression analysis, we found a correct prediction in 73% of the cases. CA 15-3 antigen makes the most significant (P <.0001) contribution to the logistic model in the prediction of malignancy in the total group, with all pelvic masses with an odds ratio of 3.86.
CONCLUSION: The combination of a simultaneous elevated level of CA 125, CA 15-3, and CA 72-4 antigens was predictive for malignant disease in almost all cases. However, such concomitant elevation was found in few of the malignant masses. Logistic regression analysis revealed that CA 15-3 antigen makes the most significant contribution to a model for the prediction of malignancy in the total group. The logistic model gave a correct prediction in 73% to 83%. The present tumor marker panel seems inferior to combinations with other test modalities, which include ultrasonography and/or physical examination and/or menopausal status or age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12193930     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.123768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  The role of CA125 in clinical practice.

Authors:  E L Moss; J Hollingworth; T M Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  J E Dodge; A L Covens; C Lacchetti; L M Elit; T Le; M Devries-Aboud; M Fung-Kee-Fung
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Measurement of HE4 and CA125 and establishment of reference intervals for the ROMA index in the sera of pregnant women.

Authors:  Jie Lu; Zhipeng Zheng; Qi Zhang; Guoli Li; Fengying Li; Zhian Le; Jun Huang; Xinyou Xie; Jun Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Electrochemiluminescent immunoassay for the determination of CA15-3 and CA72-4 using graphene oxide nanocomposite modified with CdSe quantum dots and Ru(bpy)3 complex.

Authors:  Hosein Asbaghian-Namin; Pari Karami; Hamid Naghshara; Danial Gholamin; Mohammad Johari-Ahar
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.833

5.  Mucin-1 and its relation to grade, stage and survival in ovarian carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Verena Engelstaedter; Sabine Heublein; Anamur Lan Schumacher; Miriam Lenhard; Helen Engelstaedter; Ulrich Andergassen; Margit Guenthner-Biller; Christina Kuhn; Brigitte Rack; Markus Kupka; Doris Mayr; Udo Jeschke
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Fucosylated Glycans in α1-Acid Glycoprotein for Monitoring Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis of Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Shin Yazawa; Ryo Takahashi; Takehiko Yokobori; Rie Sano; Akira Mogi; Abby R Saniabadi; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Takayuki Asao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.