Literature DB >> 12193821

Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: experience with both cauterization and clamping methods.

Rafael Reisfeld1, Raymond Nguyen, Alon Pnini.   

Abstract

The goal was to review results of sympathectomy, performed with use of either cauterization or clamping, in patients with hyperhidrosis (n = 1,312): 653 early patients undergoing electrocautery sympathectomy, 305 later patients undergoing cauterization, and 354 patients treated with a clamping procedure. Patients were interviewed by telephone about the status of symptoms, adverse outcomes, and satisfaction. Palmar hyperhidrosis was cured in all but one patient, with a 98% satisfaction rate in the clamping group and 94.3% and 95.1% in the two cauterization groups ( < or = 0.025, clamping > cauterization). Facial sweating or blushing was cured in the majority (88%) of the 301 patients reporting this symptom. Severe compensatory hidrosis occurred in less than 6% (3% of the clamping group; < or = 0.001, clamping < cauterization). Recurrence rate was 3.0%. A number of factors were related to outcome. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy with clamping appears to be at least as safe and effective as earlier cauterization techniques, with the potential advantage of reversibility in those patients unhappy with the outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12193821     DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200208000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  23 in total

1.  Azygos lobe in endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis.

Authors:  R Reisfeld
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The importance of classification in sympathetic surgery and a proposed mechanism for compensatory hyperhidrosis: experience with 464 cases.

Authors:  Rafael Reisfeld
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperidrosis.

Authors:  Arun Prasad; Mudasir Ali; Sunil Kaul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Sympathetic chain clipping for hyperhidrosis is not a reversible procedure.

Authors:  Jesus Loscertales; Miguel Congregado; Rafael Jimenez-Merchan; Gregorio Gallardo; Ana Trivino; Sergio Moreno; Beatriz Loscertales; Hugo Galera-Ruiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Focal hyperhidrosis: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Aamir Haider; Nowell Solish
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  The correlation between the method of sympathetic ablation for palmar hyperhidrosis and the occurrence of compensatory hyperhidrosis: a review.

Authors:  Doron Kopelman; Moshe Hashmonai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Diagnosis of palmar hyperhidrosis via questionnaire without physical examination.

Authors:  Steven M Keller; Riccardo Bello; Betsy Vibert; Gary Swergold; Robert Burk
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 4.435

8.  Treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis: T(4) level compared with T(3) and T(2).

Authors:  Yu-Tang Chang; Hsien-Pin Li; Jui-Ying Lee; Pei-Jung Lin; Chien-Chih Lin; Eing-Long Kao; Shah-Hwa Chou; Meei-Feng Huang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Evaluation of plantar hyperhidrosis in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy.

Authors:  Nelson Wolosker; Guilherme Yazbek; José Ribas Milanez de Campos; Paulo Kauffman; Augusto Ishy; Pedro Puech-Leão
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 4.435

10.  Results, side effects and complications after thoracoscopic sympathetic block by clamping. The monza clinical experience.

Authors:  Jennifer Francesca Sciuchetti; Fabrizio Corti; Dario Ballabio; Marcello Costa Angeli
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.