Literature DB >> 12192458

Visual latency in the spontaneous Pulfrich effect.

Gordon Heron1, Lynne McCulloch, Neale Dutton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interocular visual latency differences in patients with traumatic optic neuropathy due to midface injury were compared using both measurements of the delay from the spontaneous Pulfrich effect and pattern visual evoked potentials (VEPs).
METHODS: Six patients with a spontaneous Pulfrich effect following midfacial injury observed a target which oscillated sinusoidally with an elliptical path in the frontal plane. The spontaneous Pulfrich delay was calculated from the size of the minor axis of the target ellipse on an XY plotter adjusted until the patient judged that no depth (i.e. no ellipse) was seen. Six separate pattern-reversal VEPs were recorded monocularly, with an artificial pupil, for a 4 cycle/degree grating. The mean P100 peak latency for each eye was used to calculate interocular latency differences. For both the Pulfrich effect and VEP measures normal subjects were included for comparison.
RESULTS: Patients had P100 delays ranging from 2.8 to 17.8 ms, whereas Pulfrich delays were much shorter, ranging from 0.14 to 1.3 ms. A significant positive correlation was found between the two measures of delay, but the magnitude of the interocular difference in VEP was much greater than the delay calculated for the spontaneous Pulfrich effect. Tints used to correct the spontaneous Pulfrich effect in the patients were generally of high transmission (75-85%) and not dense enough to provoke an effect in normal observers.
CONCLUSION: We have described a technique to quantify interocular delay associated with a spontaneous Pulfrich effect in patients with midfacial trauma. Interocular delays measured from pattern-reversal VEPs are similar in direction and relative severity but are larger in absolute terms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12192458     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-002-0501-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Pulfrich effect in the clinic.

Authors:  Sijie Heng; Gordon N Dutton
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Pulfrich's phenomenon in optic nerve hypoplasia.

Authors:  Gordon Heron; Gordon N Dutton; Daphne L McCulloch; Stewart Stanger
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  The magnitude of monocular light attenuation required to elicit the Pulfrich illusion.

Authors:  C Vijay Reena Durai; Siddhart Rajendran; Michael A Webster; Sandeep Vempati; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 1.984

4.  Small-aperture monovision and the Pulfrich experience: absence of neural adaptation effects.

Authors:  Sotiris Plainis; Dionysia Petratou; Trisevgeni Giannakopoulou; Hema Radhakrishnan; Ioannis G Pallikaris; W Neil Charman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.