Literature DB >> 12192319

Vagal-sparing esophagectomy: a more physiologic alternative.

Farzaneh Banki1, Rodney J Mason, Steven R DeMeester, Jeffrey A Hagen, Nagammapudur S Balaji, Peter F Crookes, Cedric G Bremner, Jeffrey H Peters, Tom R DeMeester.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the function of the vagal nerves and the gastric reservoir after vagal-sparing esophagectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Esophagectomy as currently performed includes division of the vagal nerves and surgical alteration of the stomach, with attendant postoperative dumping, diarrhea, reduced meal capacity, and weight loss. Vagal-sparing esophagectomy has been introduced as a technique for removal of the esophagus while preserving the vagal nerves and gastric reservoir. The procedure is touted as having a low morbidity and is applicable to patients with end-stage benign or early malignant disease.
METHODS: A random sample of 15 patients at a median of 20 months after a vagal-sparing esophagectomy was compared to 23 asymptomatic normal subjects; 10 randomly selected patients, 29 months after esophagogastrectomy with colon interposition; and 10 randomly selected patients, 47 months after standard esophagectomy with gastric pull-up. Gastric mucosal acidification was tested with Congo red staining. Vagal secretory function was measured by gastric acid output and pancreatic polypeptide response to sham feeding. Vagal motor function was assessed by a technetium gastric emptying scan and a questionnaire to evaluate dumping and diarrhea. Gastric reservoir function was evaluated by measuring meal capacity and postoperative changes in body mass index.
RESULTS: Vagal-sparing esophagectomy preserved the function of the vagi, as evident by an increase in gastric acid output, a rise in serum pancreatic polypeptide following sham feeding, and preservation of normal postoperative gastric emptying in 70% of the patients. After vagal-sparing esophagectomy, patients were free of dumping and diarrhea and were analogous to normal subjects in meal capacity but had a slight reduction in the speed of eating.
CONCLUSIONS: Vagal-sparing esophagectomy preserves gastric secretory, motor, and reservoir function. Postoperatively, patients have normal alimentation, bowel regulation, and no weight loss. It is an ideal procedure for patients with end-stage benign disease, Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia, or esophageal carcinoma limited to the lamina propria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12192319      PMCID: PMC1422586          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200209000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  36 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for the entire gastrointestinal mucosal lesions.

Authors:  H Inoue
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2001-07

Review 2.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of the esophagus: band ligation technique.

Authors:  V Nwakakwa; D Fleischer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2001-07

3.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  An endoscopic test for completeness of vagotomy.

Authors:  K Kusakari; L M Nyhus; E W Gillison; C T Bombeck
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1972-08

5.  Acid response to sham feeding as a test for completeness of vagotomy.

Authors:  O Kronborg; D Andersen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Experience with sham feeding as a test for vagotomy.

Authors:  M Feldman; C T Richardson; J S Fordtran
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Results of photodynamic therapy for ablation of dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's esophagus and effect of oral steroids on stricture formation.

Authors:  M Panjehpour; B F Overholt; J M Haydek; S G Lee
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for mucosal cancer in the esophagus.

Authors:  H Makuuchi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2001-07

9.  Avoidance of esophageal stricture following severe caustic burns by the use of an intraluminal stent.

Authors:  L J Mills; A S Estrera; M R Platt
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  A safe and noninvasive test for vagal integrity revisited.

Authors:  Nagammapudur S Balaji; Peter F Crookes; Farzaneh Banki; Jeffrey A Hagen; Joy E Ardill; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-08
View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: advances in endoscopic techniques.

Authors:  Ali Azarm; Ismet Lukolic; Meenal Shukla; Ronald Concha-Parra; Frank Gress
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Topography and extent of pulmonary vagus nerve supply with respect to transthoracic oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Teus J Weijs; Jelle P Ruurda; Misha D P Luyer; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Ronald L A W Bleys
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Synchronous electrogastrographic and manometric study of the stomach as an esophageal substitute.

Authors:  Ferenc Izbéki; Tibor Wittmann; Sándor Odor; Balázs Botos; Aron Altorjay
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Current Strategies in the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-06

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of superficial esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuo Tachibana; Shoichi Kinugasa; Muneaki Shibakita; Yasuhito Tonomoto; Shinji Hattori; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Safety and Dose Study of Targeted Lung Denervation in Moderate/Severe COPD Patients.

Authors:  Arschang Valipour; Pallav L Shah; Christophe Pison; Vincent Ninane; Wim Janssens; Thierry Perez; Romain Kessler; Gaetan Deslee; Justin Garner; Christine Abele; Jorine E Hartman; Dirk-Jan Slebos
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.580

8.  Thoracoscopic vagal-sparing esophagectomy and colonic interposition for caustic stricture.

Authors:  Deniz Tihan; Tuğba Matlım; Taylan Çelik; Fatih Altıntoprak; Oktar Asoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2018-03-01

Review 9.  Reflux esophagitis, high-grade neoplasia, and early Barrett's carcinoma-what is the place of the Merendino procedure?

Authors:  A H Hölscher; D Vallböhmer; C Gutschow; E Bollschweiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Christy M Dunst; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.