Literature DB >> 12192269

Present standards for cervical cancer screening.

Anne T O'Meara1.   

Abstract

Survival rates for cancer of the uterine cervix have improved over the last 40 years largely because of the impact of screening measures such as the Pap smear. The ability to screen and treat women for preinvasive disease, cervical dysplasia, is the key factor leading to the reduction in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer. More recently, the ability to test women for the causative agent, the human papilloma virus, has emerged as a potential screening tool. New research has focused on new technologies for Pap smear screening such as thin layer technology, the appropriate intervals for screening, and the appropriate methods of incorporation of human papilloma virus testing into the screening protocols. Reviews of published studies evaluating the efficacy of new technologies suggest that there is still insufficient information to confirm improved outcome; however, results to date suggest that thin layer Pap smear technology may improve sensitivity in the detection of cervical dysplasia. Automated rescreening technologies in use may decrease the number of false-negative Pap smears and are an option for laboratories. Various professional groups and countries have differing recommendations on the interval for screening, primarily on the basis of cost-effectiveness. Some of the most important new information this year regarding cervical cancer screening includes the new Bethesda System for the reporting of Pap smears and the new guidelines for the management of the abnormal Pap smear by the American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. These guidelines incorporate human papilloma virus testing based on a multicenter trial documenting its efficacy in the triage of women with atypical squamous cells on Pap smear. These recommendations are reviewed along with the current literature on cervical cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12192269     DOI: 10.1097/00001622-200209000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol        ISSN: 1040-8746            Impact factor:   3.645


  8 in total

1.  The expression of Mcl-1 in human cervical cancer and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Chun Zhao; Liang Luo; Hua Zhao; Jing Cheng; Fei Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Stephen H Taplin; Rebecca Anhang Price; Caroline Cranos; Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 3.  New biological research and understanding of Papanicolaou's test.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Smith; Sophia H George; Erin Kobetz; Xiang-Xi Xu
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.582

4.  Preventive screening of women who use complementary and alternative medicine providers.

Authors:  Lois Downey; Patrick T Tyree; William E Lafferty
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests: considering the multilevel context of care.

Authors:  Jane M Zapka; Heather M Edwards; Veronica Chollette; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Association of Cervical Cancer Screening with Knowledge of Risk Factors, Access to Health Related Information, Health Profiles, and Health Competence Beliefs among Community-Dwelling Women in Japan

Authors:  Shino Oba; Masato Toyoshima; Hiromitsu Ogata
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-08-27

7.  IPA Analysis of Cervicovaginal Fluid from Precancerous Women Points to the Presence of Biomarkers for the Precancerous State of Cervical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Xaveer Van Ostade; Martin Dom; Geert Van Raemdonck
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2014-08-13

8.  Barriers to adoption of recent technology in cervical screening.

Authors:  Darshana Jhala; Isam Eltoum
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.091

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.