Literature DB >> 12192227

Birth weight and perinatal mortality: a comparison of "optimal" birth weight in seven Western European countries.

Wilco C Graafmans1, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Gerard J J M Borsboom, Leiv Bakketeig, Jens Langhoff-Roos, Per Bergsjø, Alison Macfarlane, S Pauline Verloove-Vanhorick, Johan P Mackenbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that a population's entire birth weight distribution may be shifted towards higher or lower birth weights, and that optimal birth weight may be lower in populations with a lower average birth weight. We evaluated this hypothesis for seven western European countries.
METHODS: We obtained data on all singleton births (N = 1,372,092) and extended perinatal deaths (stillbirths plus neonatal deaths; N = 7,900) occurring in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Scotland, the Netherlands, and Flanders (Belgium) in 1993-1995. We assessed whether countries differed in the mode of their birth weight distribution and in the birth weight associated with the lowest perinatal mortality, and then correlated the two.
RESULTS: Substantial international differences were found in the mode of the birth weight distribution, which ranged between 3384 gm in Flanders and 3628 gm in Finland. The position of the minimum of the perinatal mortality curve also differed considerably, ranging between 3755 gm in Flanders and 4305 gm in Norway. There was a strong relation between the two: for every 100 gm increase in modal birth weight, optimal birth weight was 170 gm higher (95% confidence interval = 104-236 gm).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm those of previous studies that compared two populations. To improve the identification of small babies at high risk of perinatal death, population-specific standards for birth weight should be developed and used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12192227     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200209000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  11 in total

1.  Development of a fetal weight chart using serial trans-abdominal ultrasound in an East African population: a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Christentze Schmiegelow; Thomas Scheike; Mayke Oesterholt; Daniel Minja; Caroline Pehrson; Pamela Magistrado; Martha Lemnge; Vibeke Rasch; John Lusingu; Thor G Theander; Birgitte Bruun Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  An outcome-based definition of low birthweight for births in low- and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis of the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health.

Authors:  Malinee Laopaiboon; Pisake Lumbiganon; Siwanon Rattanakanokchai; Warut Chaiwong; João Paulo Souza; Joshua P Vogel; Rintaro Mori; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  Optimal birth weight and term mortality risk differ among different ethnic groups in the U.S.

Authors:  Jihyun Jeon; Do-Hyun Kim; Min Soo Park; Chang-Gi Park; Sudhir Sriram; Kwang-Sun Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A compelling symmetry: The extended fetuses-at-risk perspective on modal, optimal and relative birthweight and gestational age.

Authors:  K S Joseph
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  International versus national growth charts for identifying small and large-for-gestational age newborns: A population-based study in 15 European countries.

Authors:  Alice Hocquette; Mélanie Durox; Rachael Wood; Kari Klungsøyr; Katarzyna Szamotulska; Sylvan Berrut; Tonia Rihs; Theopisti Kyprianou; Luule Sakkeus; Aline Lecomte; Irisa Zile; Sophie Alexander; Jeannette Klimont; Henrique Barros; Miriam Gatt; Jelena Isakova; Béatrice Blondel; Mika Gissler; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-07-15

6.  International comparisons of fetal and neonatal mortality rates in high-income countries: should exclusion thresholds be based on birth weight or gestational age?

Authors:  Ashna D Mohangoo; Béatrice Blondel; Mika Gissler; Petr Velebil; Alison Macfarlane; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Analysis of neonatal mortality:is standardizing for relative birth weight biased?

Authors:  Robert W Platt; Cande V Ananth; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Intrauterine growth restriction: effects of physiological fetal growth determinants on diagnosis.

Authors:  Kjell Haram; Eirik Søfteland; Radek Bukowski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-06-23

9.  Searching for the definition of macrosomia through an outcome-based approach.

Authors:  Jiangfeng Ye; Lin Zhang; Yan Chen; Fang Fang; ZhongCheng Luo; Jun Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Searching for the definition of macrosomia through an outcome-based approach in low- and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

Authors:  Jiangfeng Ye; Maria Regina Torloni; Erika Ota; Kapila Jayaratne; Cynthia Pileggi-Castro; Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo; Pisake Lumbiganon; Naho Morisaki; Malinee Laopaiboon; Rintaro Mori; Özge Tunçalp; Fang Fang; Hongping Yu; João Paulo Souza; Joshua Peter Vogel; Jun Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.