Literature DB >> 12191807

Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task.

Charalambos Papaxanthis1, Thierry Pozzo, Xanthi Skoura, Marco Schieppati.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects on the duration of imagined movements of changes in timing and order of performance of actual and imagined movement. Two groups of subjects had to actually execute and imagine a walking and a writing task. The first group first executed 10 trials of the actual movements (block A) and then imagined the same movements at different intervals: immediately after actual movements (block I-1) and after 25 min (I-2), 50 min (I-3) and 75 min (I-4) interval. The second group first imagined and then actually executed the tasks. The duration of actual and imagined movements, recorded by means of an electronic stopwatch operated by the subjects, was analysed. The duration of imagined movements was very similar to those of actual movements, for both tasks, regardless of either the interval elapsed from the actual movements (first group) or the order of performance (second group). However, the variability of imagined movement duration was significantly increased compared to variability of the actual movements, for both motor tasks and groups. The findings give evidence of similar cognitive processes underlying both imagination and actual performance of movement. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12191807     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00030-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  34 in total

1.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Imagined actions in multiple sclerosis patients: evidence of decline in motor cognitive prediction.

Authors:  Andrea Tacchino; Marco Bove; Ludovico Pedullà; Mario Alberto Battaglia; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Giampaolo Brichetto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Observing motor learning produces somatosensory change.

Authors:  Nicolò F Bernardi; Mohammad Darainy; Emanuela Bricolo; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Fitts's Law violation and motor imagery: are imagined movements truthful or lawful?

Authors:  Petre V Radulescu; Jos J Adam; Martin H Fischer; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice.

Authors:  Nadia Allami; Yves Paulignan; Andrea Brovelli; Driss Boussaoud
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Misperceiving the speed-accuracy tradeoff: imagined movements and perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Scott J Young; Jay Pratt; Tom Chau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motor imagery practice may compensate for the slowdown of sensorimotor processes induced by short-term upper-limb immobilization.

Authors:  Aurore Meugnot; Nounagnon Frutueux Agbangla; Yves Almecija; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-08

8.  Effect of a fatiguing protocol on motor imagery accuracy.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Marianne Haguenauer; André Dittmar; Christian Collet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Motor transfer from map ocular exploration to locomotion during spatial navigation from memory.

Authors:  Alixia Demichelis; Gérard Olivier; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: evidence from a novel continuous pointing method.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; Joshua H Siegle; Betty J Mohler; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.