Literature DB >> 12191542

Barriers to the evidence-based patient choice (EBPC) consultation.

Sarah Ford1, Theo Schofield, Tony Hope.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore barriers to the implementation of the 'evidence-based patient choice' (EBPC) consultation in medical practice. The theory behind EBPC encompasses the idea that patients should be provided with evidence-based information in a way that facilitates their ability to make choices or decisions about their health care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected general practitioners (GPs) (n=11), hospital doctors (n=10), practice nurses (n=5), academics (n=11) and lay people (n=8). Qualitative analyses of participants' responses were conducted to identify key themes and categories. Lack of medical evidence per se and evidence relevant to individual patients were the most commonly reported barriers to the EBPC consultation. Other barriers included: doctors' attitudes, limited time for doctors to keep up with the evidence and to introduce evidence into the consultation; economic and resource constraints and a lack of technical resources and training to enable doctors to practice this type of approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12191542     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00198-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ethics of evidence based medicine in the primary care setting.

Authors:  A Slowther; S Ford; T Schofield
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  The role and value of written information for patients about individual medicines: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janet Grime; Alison Blenkinsopp; David K Raynor; Kristian Pollock; Peter Knapp
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Jo Ellins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-07

4.  Putting informed and shared decision making into practice.

Authors:  Angela Towle; William Godolphin; Garry Grams; Amanda Lamarre
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Are patients' decision-making preferences being met?

Authors:  Sarah Ford; Theo Schofield; Tony Hope
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  An exploratory mixed-method study to determine factors that may affect satisfaction levels of athletes receiving chiropractic care in a nonclinic setting.

Authors:  Grant Talmage; Charmaine Korporaal; James W Brantingham
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2009-06

Review 7.  Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety.

Authors:  Yves Longtin; Hugo Sax; Lucian L Leape; Susan E Sheridan; Liam Donaldson; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  A real-world approach to Evidence-Based Medicine in general practice: a competency framework derived from a systematic review and Delphi process.

Authors:  Kevin Galbraith; Alison Ward; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Physicians' intentions and use of three patient decision aids.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Jo Logan; Carol L Bennett; Justin Presseau; Annette M O'Connor; Susan L Mitchell; Jacqueline M Tetroe; Ann Cranney; Paul Hebert; Shawn D Aaron
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Concordance of opinions between patients and physicians and their relationship with symptomatic control and future risk in patients with moderate-severe asthma.

Authors:  Astrid Crespo-Lessmann; Vicente Plaza; Francisco-Javier González-Barcala; Toni Fernández-Sánchez; Joaquín Sastre
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2017-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.