OBJECTIVES: Health care providers have an important role in acknowledging and supporting patients' self-management of chronic illnesses such as bipolar disorder. This report describes the development and evaluation of a brief measure for assessing patient perception of providers' support for self-management of bipolar disorder. METHODS: A 10-item measure was developed combining generic items from an existing measure of providers' autonomy supportive versus controlling style with items specific to the self-management of bipolar disorder. The psychometric properties of the measure and its relation to clinical variables were evaluated in a sample of patients enrolled in an ongoing randomized intervention trial. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 420 patients with a chart diagnosis of bipolar disorder (mean age=44, 68% female, 88% Caucasian). The proportion of missing responses for items ranged from 0 to 3%. Reliability coefficient alpha for the full scale was 0.94. Corrected item-total correlations for individual items ranged from 0.70 to 0.83. Factor analysis identified a single factor accounting for 67% of total variance. Factor loadings for individual items were all at least 0.75. The measure showed moderate positive correlations with measures of self-efficacy for managing bipolar disorder (r=0.34; p < 0.001), treatment satisfaction (r=0.63; p < 0.001), small negative correlations with measures of mania symptoms (r=-0.11; p < 0.03) and depressive symptoms (r=-0.09; p < 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: This measure shows good psychometric properties and good evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. It is promising for assessing an important aspect of care for bipolar disorder.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Health care providers have an important role in acknowledging and supporting patients' self-management of chronic illnesses such as bipolar disorder. This report describes the development and evaluation of a brief measure for assessing patient perception of providers' support for self-management of bipolar disorder. METHODS: A 10-item measure was developed combining generic items from an existing measure of providers' autonomy supportive versus controlling style with items specific to the self-management of bipolar disorder. The psychometric properties of the measure and its relation to clinical variables were evaluated in a sample of patients enrolled in an ongoing randomized intervention trial. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 420 patients with a chart diagnosis of bipolar disorder (mean age=44, 68% female, 88% Caucasian). The proportion of missing responses for items ranged from 0 to 3%. Reliability coefficient alpha for the full scale was 0.94. Corrected item-total correlations for individual items ranged from 0.70 to 0.83. Factor analysis identified a single factor accounting for 67% of total variance. Factor loadings for individual items were all at least 0.75. The measure showed moderate positive correlations with measures of self-efficacy for managing bipolar disorder (r=0.34; p < 0.001), treatment satisfaction (r=0.63; p < 0.001), small negative correlations with measures of mania symptoms (r=-0.11; p < 0.03) and depressive symptoms (r=-0.09; p < 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: This measure shows good psychometric properties and good evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. It is promising for assessing an important aspect of care for bipolar disorder.
Authors: Colin A Depp; John L Stricker; David Zagorsky; Lisa C Goodale; Lisa T Eyler; Thomas L Patterson; Barry D Lebowitz; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2008-12-06
Authors: Kelly Stolzmann; Mark Meterko; Christopher J Miller; Lindsay Belanger; Marjorie Nealon Seibert; Mark S Bauer Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Laurel A Copeland; Alexander L Miller; Deborah E Welsh; John F McCarthy; John E Zeber; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Peter Bower; Anne Kennedy; David Reeves; Anne Rogers; Tom Blakeman; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Robert Bowen; Martin Eden; Caroline Gardner; Mark Hann; Victoria Lee; Rebecca Morris; Joanne Protheroe; Gerry Richardson; Caroline Sanders; Angela Swallow; David Thompson Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Jochen Gensichen; Michael Von Korff; Carolyn M Rutter; Michelle D Seelig; Evette J Ludman; Elizabeth Hb Lin; Paul Ciechanowski; Bessie A Young; Edward H Wagner; Wayne J Katon Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-09-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Peter Bower; Chris Roberts; Neil O'Leary; Patrick Callaghan; Penny Bee; Claire Fraser; Chris Gibbons; Nicola Olleveant; Anne Rogers; Linda Davies; Richard Drake; Caroline Sanders; Oonagh Meade; Andrew Grundy; Lauren Walker; Lindsey Cree; Kathryn Berzins; Helen Brooks; Susan Beatty; Patrick Cahoon; Anita Rolfe; Karina Lovell Journal: Trials Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 2.279