Literature DB >> 12190678

Perineural invasion has a negative impact on survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma.

R Yamaguchi1, M Nagino, K Oda, J Kamiya, K Uesaka, Y Nimura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of perineural invasion of gallbladder carcinoma remains unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence and mode of perineural invasion of gallbladder carcinoma and clarify its prognostic significance.
METHODS: A clinicopathological study was conducted on 68 patients who underwent attempted curative resection for gallbladder carcinoma. According to the pathological tumour node metastasis (pTNM) classification of the Union Internacional Contra la Cancrum, there were five (7 per cent), nine (13 per cent), 20 (29 per cent) and 34 (50 per cent) patients with pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 disease respectively. Twenty patients (29 per cent) had pM1 disease, including involved para-aortic nodes, liver metastases and localized dissemination.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of perineural invasion was 71 per cent (48 of 68 patients). Forty-four (96 per cent) of 46 patients with extrahepatic bile duct invasion had perineural invasion. Although several histological factors were associated with perineural invasion, multivariate analysis demonstrated that extrahepatic bile duct invasion was the only significant factor correlated with perineural invasion (odds ratio 99.0, P < 0.001). The perineural invasion index, defined as the ratio of the number of involved nerves to the total number of nerves examined, was significantly higher at the centre than in the proximal and distal parts of the tumour in the 46 patients with extrahepatic bile duct invasion (P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate for patients with perineural invasion was significantly lower than that for patients with no invasion (7 versus 72 per cent; P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazard analysis identified perineural invasion (relative risk (RR) 5.3, P < 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (RR 2.5, P = 0.008) as significant independent prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: Perineural invasion is common in advanced gallbladder carcinoma and has a significant negative impact on patient survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12190678     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02184.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  32 in total

1.  Preoperative cholangitis and metastatic lymph node have a negative impact on survival after resection of extrahepatic bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Jai Young Cho; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Dae Wook Hwang; Kyuwhan Jung; Ji Hoon Kim; Yujin Kwon; Haeryoung Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Long-term outcomes of incidental gallbladder carcinoma without additional resection: A single institution experiment.

Authors:  Tomohiro Sugiyama; Kenta Makino; Yukiko Fukui; Hiromitsu Kinoshita; Akira Miki; Shigeki Uchida; Michihiko Tsubono; Yasushi Adachi
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-02

3.  Invasion of the hepatic artery is a crucial predictor of poor outcomes in gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Akihiko Kobayashi; Tatsuya Oda; Kiyoshi Fukunaga; Ryoko Sasaki; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Immunohistochemically demonstrated lymph node micrometastasis and prognosis in patients with gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Eiji Sasaki; Masato Nagino; Tomoki Ebata; Koji Oda; Toshiyuki Arai; Hideki Nishio; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Ten-year experience in the management of gallbladder cancer from a single hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre with review of the literature.

Authors:  Seok L Ong; Giuseppe Garcea; Sarah C Thomasset; Christopher P Neal; David M Lloyd; David P Berry; Ashley R Dennison
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Surgical management of infrahilar/suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma: an analysis of the surgical procedures, surgical margins, and survivals of 77 patients.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Kazuaki Shimada; Satoshi Nara; Minoru Esaki; Hidenori Ojima; Tsuyoshi Sano; Junji Yamamoto; Tomoo Kosuge
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Prognostic factors of patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma following aggressive surgical resection.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Akira Nakashima; Naru Kondo; Ryutaro Sakabe; Hironori Kobayashi; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Portal vein arterialization: a salvage procedure for a totally de-arterialized liver. The Paul Brousse Hospital experience.

Authors:  Prashant Bhangui; Chady Salloum; Chetana Lim; Paola Andreani; Arie Ariche; René Adam; Denis Castaing; Tech Kerba; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Hepatectomy of segment 4b and 5 with extrahepatic bile duct resection for pT2 gallbladder carcinoma is valid: a single-institution result.

Authors:  Shunsuke Onoe; Yuji Kaneoka; Atsuyuki Maeda; Yuichi Takayama; Yasuyuki Fukami; Masatoshi Isogai
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-08-19

10.  Guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas: surgical treatment.

Authors:  Satoshi Kondo; Tadahiro Takada; Masaru Miyazaki; Shuichi Miyakawa; Kazuhiro Tsukada; Masato Nagino; Junji Furuse; Hiroya Saito; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Masakazu Yamamoto; Masato Kayahara; Fumio Kimura; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Satoshi Nozawa; Masahiro Yoshida; Keita Wada; Satoshi Hirano; Hodaka Amano; Fumihiko Miura
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.