| Literature DB >> 12190644 |
J Mason1.
Abstract
The author seeks to establish both the specialty of clinincal trichology and its holistic nature. The myth that trichology is either an alternative therapy or a complimentary therapy is strongly refuted. Comparisons are drawn between the level of service which the trichologist can provide and that which is usually available through traditional medical channels. The training of trichologists is discussed in outline and its strong scientific base is emphasized. Whilst admitting that the majority of trichologists are not medically qualified, the author stresses that trichologists are taught medicine within the limits adequate for professional discharge of their restricted but specialized role. The article concludes by identifying a need for both the public and medical profession to learn how to differentiate between the properly trained and qualified trichologist and the many unqualified charlatans who monopolize publicity and proliferate in the high street. There would appear to be a clear case for better understanding of the profession and what it has to offer.Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12190644 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2002.01081.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Dermatol ISSN: 0307-6938 Impact factor: 3.470