Literature DB >> 12189222

Clinical utility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in characterizing breast lesions.

Rachel Katz-Brull1, Philip T Lavin, Robert E Lenkinski.   

Abstract

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) of the breast has been proposed as an adjunct to the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination to improve the specificity of distinguishing malignant breast tumors from benign breast tumors. In this review, we carry out a pooled analysis of the clinical breast (1)H MRS studies undertaken to date to determine the factors that influence the diagnostic performance of this method. In total, five studies of breast (1)H MRS from four independent centers around the world have been published to date. Altogether, 153 tumors were examined, 100 of which were confirmed histologically to be malignant and 53 of which were benign. The lesions presenting a detectable composite choline signal in their corresponding (1)H MR spectra were diagnosed as malignant, whereas the lesions with no choline signal were diagnosed as benign. The sensitivity and specificity of breast (1)H MRS for detecting breast cancer were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 73% to 89%) and 85% (95% CI = 71% to 93%), respectively, and both values could be as high as 92% after technical exclusions. In a subgroup of 20 young women, the sensitivity and the specificity of the method approached 100%. The factors limiting the sensitivity of the examination were mainly technical. The use of the composite choline signal as a marker for malignancy in breast (1)H MRS is a robust method with highly reliable interpretation, because it is based on the appearance of a single peak. The method is likely to provide even better results with technologic advances in breast MRS that lead to the improved detection of the composite choline signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12189222     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.16.1197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  62 in total

Review 1.  Novel agents for chemoprevention, screening methods, and sampling issues.

Authors:  Mary Jo Fackler; Ella Evron; Seema A Khan; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  Stable isotope-resolved metabolomics and applications for drug development.

Authors:  Teresa W-M Fan; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Katherine Sellers; Hunter N B Moseley; Richard M Higashi; Andrew N Lane
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 12.310

3.  Metabolic signatures imaged in cancer-induced cachexia.

Authors:  Marie-France Penet; Mayur M Gadiya; Balaji Krishnamachary; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Martin G Pomper; Dmitri Artemov; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Concepción González Hernando; Laura Esteban; Teresa Cañas; Enrique Van den Brule; Miguel Pastrana
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Noninvasive imaging identifies new roles for cyclooxygenase-2 in choline and lipid metabolism of human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Tariq Shah; Ioannis Stasinopoulos; Flonne Wildes; Samata Kakkad; Dmitri Artemov; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase domain containing 5 (GDPD5) expression correlates with malignant choline phospholipid metabolite profiles in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria D Cao; Mailin Döpkens; Balaji Krishnamachary; Farhad Vesuna; Mayur M Gadiya; Per E Lønning; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Kristine Glunde
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Quantitative in vivo proton MR spectroscopic assessment of lipid metabolism: Value for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  Sunitha B Thakur; Joao V Horvat; Ileana Hancu; Olivia M Sutton; Blanca Bernard-Davila; Michael Weber; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Adele Marino; Daly Avendano; Doris Leithner; Sandra Brennan; Dilip Giri; Elizabeth Manderski; Elizabeth A Morris; Katja Pinker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Biochemical characterization of breast tumors by in vivo and in vitro magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).

Authors:  Uma Sharma; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2009-01-17

9.  Feasibility of single-voxel MRS measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient of water in breast tumors.

Authors:  C A Corum; A D McIntosh; P J Bolan; M Nelson; A L Snyder; N J Powell; J Boyum; T H Emory; D Yee; T M Tuttle; L I Everson; M Garwood
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.