Literature DB >> 12188350

New technique for estimating thresholds of toxicity in ecological risk assessment.

Mark L Hanson1, Keith R Solomon.   

Abstract

The use and utility of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) in ecological risk assessment is a contentious issue. One concern is that the NOEC is not representative of a concentration at which no biologically significant effect is occurring. A new method has been developed to estimate the threshold of toxicity, or a true NOEC, for aquatic plants. The method involves determining the effective concentration (ECx) of a number of endpoints from one species. These ECx values are plotted on a log-probability scale. The x-intercept, or a low centile, of the distribution can be interpreted as the threshold of toxicity for that plant at that response level. This threshold is the concentration at which no effects should be observed for any endpoint above that response level. It is based on the assumptions that multiple effect measures from a single species will be log-normally distributed and thatthe distribution contains all possible endpoints for that species. The thresholds and the distributions can then be used as a substitute for the NOEC or ECx in risk assessment techniques, such as hazard quotients and probabilistic ecological risk assessment. This new method of estimating toxicitythresholds is more realistic than the use of arbitrary uncertainty factors, is more conservative than current probabilistic risk assessment methods, allows for simple comparison between species and exposure duration to a toxicant, and may be useful for assessing mixture toxicity. This technique was applied to field derived data with Lemna gibba, Myriophyllum spicatum, and M. sibiricumto assess potential risks from monochloroacetic acid (MCA). Using this new risk assessment method, we conclude that MCA does not appear to pose a risk to aquatic macrophytes under field conditions at current environmental concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12188350     DOI: 10.1021/es011490d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

1.  Deriving field-based sediment quality guidelines from the relationship between species density and contaminant level using a novel nonparametric empirical Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Gilbert C S Lui; W K Li; Anders Bjørgesæter; Kenneth M Y Leung
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Endosulfan and its metabolite, endosulfan sulfate, in freshwater ecosystems of South Florida: a probabilistic aquatic ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Gary M Rand; John F Carriger; Piero R Gardinali; Joffre Castro
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Recommended approaches to the scientific evaluation of ecotoxicological hazards and risks of endocrine-active substances.

Authors:  Peter Matthiessen; Gerald T Ankley; Ronald C Biever; Poul Bjerregaard; Christopher Borgert; Kristin Brugger; Amy Blankinship; Janice Chambers; Katherine K Coady; Lisa Constantine; Zhichao Dang; Nancy D Denslow; David A Dreier; Steve Dungey; L Earl Gray; Melanie Gross; Patrick D Guiney; Markus Hecker; Henrik Holbech; Taisen Iguchi; Sarah Kadlec; Natalie K Karouna-Renier; Ioanna Katsiadaki; Yukio Kawashima; Werner Kloas; Henry Krueger; Anu Kumar; Laurent Lagadic; Annegaaike Leopold; Steven L Levine; Gerd Maack; Sue Marty; James Meador; Ellen Mihaich; Jenny Odum; Lisa Ortego; Joanne Parrott; Daniel Pickford; Mike Roberts; Christoph Schaefers; Tamar Schwarz; Keith Solomon; Tim Verslycke; Lennart Weltje; James R Wheeler; Mike Williams; Jeffrey C Wolf; Kunihiko Yamazaki
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.992

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.