BACKGROUND: This study was designed to define myocardial viability and establish practical cut-off values for differentiating normal myocardial tissue from subendocardial and transmural scar tissue by using electromechanical mapping (EMM). We validated our results by delayed-enhancement cardiac MRI (DE-MRI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 15 ambulatory patients with stable coronary disease who were candidates for cardiac catheterization. Within 48 hours of EMM, DE-MRI was performed. Using EMM software, we created a bull's eye precisely matched to that generated by DE-MRI. Segment by segment, we compared the MRI results to the corresponding unipolar voltage value for that same segment in the EMM bull's eye. Of 300 total segments, 275 were compared. The segments were divided into normal (n=211), subendocardial scar (n=49), and transmural scar (n=15). We found that subendocardial (6.8+/-2.9 mV) and transmural (4.6+/-1.9 mV) scar segments had significantly less unipolar voltage than normal (11.6+/-4.5 mV) segments (P<0.05 for each comparison). When normal myocardium was compared with myocardium with subendocardial scar, the threshold for differentiating between the two areas was 7.9 mV (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 80%). Comparison of normal tissue to transmural scar yielded a threshold of 6.9 mV (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that normal myocardium can be accurately distinguished from myocardium with subendocardial or transmural infarcts on the basis of unipolar voltage values obtained through EMM. This is the first study to validate these results by using cardiac DE-MRI in humans.
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to define myocardial viability and establish practical cut-off values for differentiating normal myocardial tissue from subendocardial and transmural scar tissue by using electromechanical mapping (EMM). We validated our results by delayed-enhancement cardiac MRI (DE-MRI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 15 ambulatory patients with stable coronary disease who were candidates for cardiac catheterization. Within 48 hours of EMM, DE-MRI was performed. Using EMM software, we created a bull's eye precisely matched to that generated by DE-MRI. Segment by segment, we compared the MRI results to the corresponding unipolar voltage value for that same segment in the EMM bull's eye. Of 300 total segments, 275 were compared. The segments were divided into normal (n=211), subendocardial scar (n=49), and transmural scar (n=15). We found that subendocardial (6.8+/-2.9 mV) and transmural (4.6+/-1.9 mV) scar segments had significantly less unipolar voltage than normal (11.6+/-4.5 mV) segments (P<0.05 for each comparison). When normal myocardium was compared with myocardium with subendocardial scar, the threshold for differentiating between the two areas was 7.9 mV (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 80%). Comparison of normal tissue to transmural scar yielded a threshold of 6.9 mV (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that normal myocardium can be accurately distinguished from myocardium with subendocardial or transmural infarcts on the basis of unipolar voltage values obtained through EMM. This is the first study to validate these results by using cardiac DE-MRI in humans.
Authors: Peter J Psaltis; Andrew C W Zannettino; Stan Gronthos; Stephen G Worthley Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Marlos R Fernandes; Guilherme V Silva; Yi Zheng; Edie M Oliveira; Cristiano O Cardoso; John Canales; Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz; Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo; Fred Baimbridge; Emerson C Perin Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2008
Authors: Guilherme V Silva; Marlos R Fernandes; Cristiano O Cardoso; Ricardo R Sanz; Edie M Oliveira; Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo; Javier Lopez; Franca S Angeli; Yi Zheng; James T Willerson; Emerson C Perin Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2011
Authors: Takeshi Sasaki; Christopher F Miller; Rozann Hansford; Juemin Yang; Brian S Caffo; Menekhem M Zviman; Charles A Henrikson; Joseph E Marine; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Harikrishna Tandri; Sunil Sinha; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Stefan L Zimmerman; David A Bluemke; Gordon F Tomaselli; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin; Saman Nazarian Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2012-11-13
Authors: Paula Vesterinen; Helena Hänninen; Milla Karvonen; Kirsi Lauerma; Miia Holmström; Markku Mäkijärvi; Heikki Väänänen; Jukka Nenonen; Toivo Katila; Lauri Toivonen Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Takeshi Sasaki; Christopher F Miller; Rozann Hansford; Vadim Zipunnikov; Menekhem M Zviman; Joseph E Marine; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Harikrishna Tandri; Sunil Sinha; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Stefan L Zimmerman; David A Bluemke; Gordon F Tomaselli; Ronald D Berger; Henry R Halperin; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-11-14
Authors: Benoit Desjardins; Thomas Crawford; Eric Good; Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady; Frank Bogun Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-02-14 Impact factor: 6.343