Literature DB >> 12186800

Assessing myocardial viability and infarct transmurality with left ventricular electromechanical mapping in patients with stable coronary artery disease: validation by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging.

Emerson C Perin1, Guilherme V Silva, Rogerio Sarmento-Leite, Andre L S Sousa, Marcus Howell, Raja Muthupillai, Brenda Lambert, William K Vaughn, Scott D Flamm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to define myocardial viability and establish practical cut-off values for differentiating normal myocardial tissue from subendocardial and transmural scar tissue by using electromechanical mapping (EMM). We validated our results by delayed-enhancement cardiac MRI (DE-MRI). METHODS AND
RESULTS: We prospectively studied 15 ambulatory patients with stable coronary disease who were candidates for cardiac catheterization. Within 48 hours of EMM, DE-MRI was performed. Using EMM software, we created a bull's eye precisely matched to that generated by DE-MRI. Segment by segment, we compared the MRI results to the corresponding unipolar voltage value for that same segment in the EMM bull's eye. Of 300 total segments, 275 were compared. The segments were divided into normal (n=211), subendocardial scar (n=49), and transmural scar (n=15). We found that subendocardial (6.8+/-2.9 mV) and transmural (4.6+/-1.9 mV) scar segments had significantly less unipolar voltage than normal (11.6+/-4.5 mV) segments (P<0.05 for each comparison). When normal myocardium was compared with myocardium with subendocardial scar, the threshold for differentiating between the two areas was 7.9 mV (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 80%). Comparison of normal tissue to transmural scar yielded a threshold of 6.9 mV (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 88%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that normal myocardium can be accurately distinguished from myocardium with subendocardial or transmural infarcts on the basis of unipolar voltage values obtained through EMM. This is the first study to validate these results by using cardiac DE-MRI in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12186800     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000026394.01888.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  32 in total

Review 1.  Endoventricular electromechanical mapping-the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of the NOGA XP Cardiac Navigation System.

Authors:  Peter J Psaltis; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Intramyocardial navigation and mapping for stem cell delivery.

Authors:  Peter J Psaltis; Andrew C W Zannettino; Stan Gronthos; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Validation of QwikStar Catheter for left ventricular electromechanical mapping with NOGA XP system.

Authors:  Marlos R Fernandes; Guilherme V Silva; Yi Zheng; Edie M Oliveira; Cristiano O Cardoso; John Canales; Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz; Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo; Fred Baimbridge; Emerson C Perin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

4.  A dosing study of bone marrow mononuclear cells for transendocardial injection in a pig model of chronic ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Guilherme V Silva; Marlos R Fernandes; Cristiano O Cardoso; Ricardo R Sanz; Edie M Oliveira; Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo; Javier Lopez; Franca S Angeli; Yi Zheng; James T Willerson; Emerson C Perin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

5.  Integration of CMR scar imaging and electroanatomic mapping: the future of VT ablation?

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02

6.  Myocardial structural associations with local electrograms: a study of postinfarct ventricular tachycardia pathophysiology and magnetic resonance-based noninvasive mapping.

Authors:  Takeshi Sasaki; Christopher F Miller; Rozann Hansford; Juemin Yang; Brian S Caffo; Menekhem M Zviman; Charles A Henrikson; Joseph E Marine; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Harikrishna Tandri; Sunil Sinha; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Stefan L Zimmerman; David A Bluemke; Gordon F Tomaselli; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-11-13

7.  Temporal analysis of the depolarization wave of healed myocardial infarction in body surface potential mapping.

Authors:  Paula Vesterinen; Helena Hänninen; Milla Karvonen; Kirsi Lauerma; Miia Holmström; Markku Mäkijärvi; Heikki Väänänen; Jukka Nenonen; Toivo Katila; Lauri Toivonen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Functional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of myocardial viability and perfusion: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2003-11-01

9.  Impact of nonischemic scar features on local ventricular electrograms and scar-related ventricular tachycardia circuits in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Takeshi Sasaki; Christopher F Miller; Rozann Hansford; Vadim Zipunnikov; Menekhem M Zviman; Joseph E Marine; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Harikrishna Tandri; Sunil Sinha; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Stefan L Zimmerman; David A Bluemke; Gordon F Tomaselli; Ronald D Berger; Henry R Halperin; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-14

10.  Infarct architecture and characteristics on delayed enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomic mapping in patients with postinfarction ventricular arrhythmia.

Authors:  Benoit Desjardins; Thomas Crawford; Eric Good; Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady; Frank Bogun
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 6.343

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.